From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14199C433EF for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:45:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A5A601FA for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230148AbhJLQrs (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:47:48 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55142 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231622AbhJLQrk (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:47:40 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D801A601FA; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:45:33 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Hanjun Guo , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sudeep Holla , Len Brown , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: arm64: fix section mismatch warning Message-ID: References: <20210927141921.1760209-1-arnd@kernel.org> <988fa24c-76d2-1c9d-9761-b356efb0576c@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 04:16:09PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 9:20 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 9:03 AM Hanjun Guo wrote: > > > On 2021/9/27 22:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > From: Arnd Bergmann > > > > > > > > In a gcc-11 randconfig build I came across this warning: > > > > > > > > WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x2c084): Section mismatch in reference from the function next_platform_timer() to the variable .init.data:acpi_gtdt_desc > > > > The function next_platform_timer() references > > > > the variable __initdata acpi_gtdt_desc. > > > > This is often because next_platform_timer lacks a __initdata > > > > annotation or the annotation of acpi_gtdt_desc is wrong. > > > > > > > > This happens when next_platform_timer() fails to get inlined > > > > despite the inline annotation. Adding '__init' solves the issue, > > > > and it seems best to remove the 'inline' in the process seems > > > > better anyway. > > > > > > There was a patch to fix this issue as well [1], > > > but not merged yet. > > > > > > [1]: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/7f29a149-e005-f13f-2cc4-a9eb737107e1@huawei.com/T/ > > > > Right, either of those patches should be fine. > > > > Rafael, can you pick one of them up? > > I can, but arm54 ACPI changes go in via arm64 as a rule. Queued as https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/596143e3aec3 -- Catalin