From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: bus: Match first 9 bytes of device IDs
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 18:21:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YhkQKfE8ErtFBmSB@zx2c4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXGtANm3SMoREymDSyx+wpn3L=Ex5q5mpgQigOwmEp33Lg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 6:13 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> The device subsystem side of things already deals with this properly:
> the modalias of the QEMU vmgenid device comes up as
> 'acpi:QEMUVGID:VM_GEN_COUNTER', which means it already captures the
> entire string, and exposes it in the correct way (modulo the all caps)
Ahh, so the userspace side of this won't work right. Shucks. That's what
I was concerned about.
> I don't like this hack. If we are going to accept the fact that CIDs
> could be arbitrary length strings, we should handle them properly.
>
> So what we need is a way for a module to describe its compatibility
> with such a _CID, which shouldn't be that complicated.
Can't we do something more boring and just...
diff --git a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
index 4bb71979a8fd..5da5d990ff58 100644
--- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
+++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
@@ -210,9 +210,9 @@ struct css_device_id {
__u8 type; /* subchannel type */
kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
};
-#define ACPI_ID_LEN 9
+#define ACPI_ID_LEN 16
struct acpi_device_id {
__u8 id[ACPI_ID_LEN];
kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
As you can see from the context, those additional 7 bytes were being
wasted on padding anyway inside the acpi_device_id struct, so it's
basically free, it would seem. This seems like the least convoluted way
of solving this issue? If we ever encounter _more_ ACPI devices with
weird names, we could revisit a fancy dynamic solution, but for now, why
don't we keep it simple?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-25 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-25 15:55 [PATCH] ACPI: bus: Match first 9 bytes of device IDs Alexander Graf
2022-02-25 16:57 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-02-25 17:09 ` Alexander Graf
2022-02-25 17:16 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-02-25 17:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-25 17:21 ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2022-02-25 17:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-25 17:33 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-02-25 18:03 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-02-25 18:39 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-02-25 19:06 ` Alexander Graf
2022-02-25 21:03 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YhkQKfE8ErtFBmSB@zx2c4.com \
--to=jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox