From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6F6C433F5 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 19:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244882AbiCHTTr (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 14:19:47 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44526 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241169AbiCHTTq (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 14:19:46 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652FB4B867; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 11:18:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C89D1655; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 11:18:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from lpieralisi (unknown [10.57.38.189]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CEFF3FA45; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 11:18:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 19:18:39 +0000 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Ilkka Koskinen Cc: guohanjun@huawei.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, lenb@kernel.org, robert.moore@intel.com, james.morse@arm.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@amperecomputing.com, scott@os.amperecomputing.com, darren@os.amperecomputing.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/2] ACPI: Arm Generic Diagnostic Dump and Reset device Message-ID: References: <20220304054003.152319-1-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 02:29:10PM -0800, Ilkka Koskinen wrote: [...] > > > Would you prefer this version, which doesn't have platform > > > device/driver any more? > > > > I thought about that and in order to keep consistency it is better to > > keep the platform device model, so please resend the latest version > > platform device based and I will ACK it (hopefully it is not too late > > for v5.18). > > Sure, I can do that. Just one question, do you still prefer agdi_init() > getting called from acpi_init() or via device_initcall()? In acpi_init(), thanks. Lorenzo