From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D0FC433EF for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 13:28:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238108AbiDGNaS (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2022 09:30:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39616 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232597AbiDGNaS (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2022 09:30:18 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12DE51CC402 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 06:28:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=WXMXF9kTfNByY6iB1S9IPFjIYZPUguzDj/Fd9M8O6GQ=; b=hfsYuBCTQR2kUqLL08ZDAMLkKI xOS2Smt2JxMOzsBm4Cj3Xd1TuoOo5JqDLDh6GkEQRT9ejahjJ3gzXMPRBF9u42R8epj99Oiqj/lMs FshlyVYurXZ1aj3cnQk6Jo2MiKokkjHrJUoRKBX8GCXjISeu2s33uUiHpuRuIL2vxoJ8dBHqdCn5B qHiGvdkX7W16zh4tY0qg8WMrSGkQYWoMPb3wUrOxtWh+Mc4o/2QLAJvJsN8eWA0l4cj+d0TsmQ1oz Eo5KRcq3nKQhfw54ZPv3M8FXeCAzIycDXfVuM6PFTBLb6i2dKFVoA6AVM0qF3J0FlOpgzmKTRZV4t Z669NKpw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ncSBO-00C8Ri-Az; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 13:28:18 +0000 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 06:28:18 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Shameer Kolothum Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, jon@solid-run.com, linuxarm@huawei.com, steven.price@arm.com, guohanjun@huawei.com, yangyicong@huawei.com, Sami.Mujawar@arm.com, will@kernel.org, wanghuiqiang@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/11] ACPI/IORT: Add support to retrieve IORT RMR reserved regions Message-ID: References: <20220404124209.1086-1-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> <20220404124209.1086-7-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220404124209.1086-7-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > +static void iort_rmr_desc_check_overlap(struct acpi_iort_rmr_desc *desc, u32 count) Overly long line. > void iommu_dma_put_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *list) > { > + if (!is_of_node(dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev)->iommu_fwnode)) > + iort_iommu_put_resv_regions(dev, list); > + > generic_iommu_put_resv_regions(dev, list); > } Why can't this just go into generic_iommu_put_resv_regions? The idea that the iommu low-level drivers need to call into dma-iommu which is a consumer of the IOMMU API is odd. Especially if that just calls out to ACPI code and generic IOMMU code only anyway.