From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] ACPI: property: Unify integer value reading functions
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 17:25:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoekxdtV9IA7OP7h@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220520061148.21366-7-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 09:11:46AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Unify functions reading ACPI property integer values into a single macro,
> and call that macro to generate the functions for each bit depth.
>
> Also use size_t for the counter instead of int.
...
> +#define DECLARE_ACPI_PROPERTY_COPY(bits) \
> + static int \
> + acpi_copy_property_array_u##bits(const union acpi_object *items, \
Personally I find much better if function templates in macros are not indented
additionally.
> + u##bits *val, size_t nval) \
> + { \
> + size_t i; \
> + \
> + for (i = 0; i < nval; i++) { \
> + if (items[i].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) \
> + return -EPROTO; \
> + if (items[i].integer.value > U##bits##_MAX) \
> + return -EOVERFLOW; \
> + \
> + val[i] = items[i].integer.value; \
> + } \
> + return 0; \
> }
On top of that, we use a minimum compiler that supports _Generic(). Why not to
use it?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-20 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-20 6:11 [PATCH v2 0/8] ACPI: Buffer property and reference as string support Sakari Ailus
2022-05-20 6:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ACPI: property: Return type of acpi_add_nondev_subnodes() should be bool Sakari Ailus
2022-05-20 6:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] ACPI: property: Tie data nodes to acpi handles Sakari Ailus
2022-05-20 6:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] ACPI: property: Use acpi_object_type consistently in property ref parsing Sakari Ailus
2022-05-20 6:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] ACPI: property: Move property ref argument parsing into a new function Sakari Ailus
2022-05-20 6:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] ACPI: property: Switch node property referencing from ifs to a switch Sakari Ailus
2022-05-20 6:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] ACPI: property: Unify integer value reading functions Sakari Ailus
2022-05-20 14:25 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2022-05-20 22:04 ` Sakari Ailus
2022-05-20 6:11 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] ACPI: property: Add support for parsing buffer property UUID Sakari Ailus
2022-05-20 14:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-05-25 8:13 ` Sakari Ailus
2022-05-20 6:11 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] ACPI: property: Read buffer properties as integers Sakari Ailus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YoekxdtV9IA7OP7h@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox