From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC1EECAAD1 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229688AbiH3POL (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:14:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32810 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229608AbiH3POL (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:14:11 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFFBF122BD3; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 08:14:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1661872449; x=1693408449; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=MZ2ZerYuF3A2KgxxfSjNdhOa11NynO633L1K+Ai+Uz0=; b=cMw3OyAn6N4dEtGDxEAaQT3Dlr85eJtz8Oka3BwzjS+SlZZW42olMRTE 28CINRO+tv/5h0DDF26Qs1oMbeJMb+RQQSlfru5nB1mvuBeZOiTXE2Rvy jm0Hwf90GlaFTL9Jkbqu6L4cbeZNZnG9SK2fKFu2z4bneCknVgilJ2ERN RkRY6x/NJLp2LNSx/3HbzAEYqNSXFWs2WPFGjR9HQFF0ywgXw+9woHy+4 8OjW+Gqczmcn/DVemHOEJ1IxwgI9EYCSP0oaOVBkgdg1vORhsjCVBDFol EuSf3m17DxzdcMT7cY3nfmb47Bw1lkDQdOHwhFonVhEeoUnEkGBTjKXul g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10455"; a="381499167" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,275,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="381499167" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Aug 2022 08:14:08 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,275,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="644863987" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Aug 2022 08:14:06 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oT2wF-0060Qb-29; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 18:14:03 +0300 Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 18:14:03 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI: PMIC: Use sizeof() instead of hard coded value Message-ID: References: <20220830135532.28992-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220830135532.28992-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 04:55:31PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > It's better to use sizeof() of a given buffer than spreading > a hard coded value. It seems I have noticed more to convert. But I will wait for others to comment on the published version. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko