From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B1978F4F; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 16:36:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743438984; cv=none; b=WEJcDy4jnL7/pYx9QM04Q1RFh/0XmlEFiiBBsIIELAhmJeAU6qdxJsGdGZOq8Y9XzTy5A96VQQuytOtaH/FTiBX0tXOGeL5L7hJs7WA0sM7kEoM7sqb4OdD5b3YDY/h0dv7lGX8Vz1D3Kb/LYCBBm39UcrYyn/5MlCycn90PXIM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743438984; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CQvu9THSFTJVZsQPbF4NwMbzdwn2Ht5kDHjXq9KwwMk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=q+cZCed9BSmHtKWmT31W63tkojSRbIDse8AZh1Zqq0UFniFCFDoFVFfJNC3asqcn6uHkrz5J9rYjG94bVcjPtZOYMax2hXipb+Jm+qKR2HFQBg3OCuQZQLFZclkMC3pNyPOXNRdINoA8KWcVMV13SWQuYckRMuwFpBvbu+KNWTI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=W53wfwTd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="W53wfwTd" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1743438983; x=1774974983; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=CQvu9THSFTJVZsQPbF4NwMbzdwn2Ht5kDHjXq9KwwMk=; b=W53wfwTdm0i6luzsCMMnloYz3WbyU82AKZMWRfet5nh1O8lDTi5LnaYe NsmtDoy+R5FeXK/sjweKrjNTkg/xyabxC++iEEqoYdFgNFdId/tLi1aWM JxCEYUUmth2lEXBk+EkOQKC04ONIohvu1zd0h4RbF+VuNUFbDUYCpBJY8 2q4Q0qhfc6MbxUdbTnpoGnuo4lcf0zF/ua3ih6f9qjvgi/UPB47s1B4YA rH3KaT9zjhH3XjxYQjOtpfQYDPS/J2VB8UajW2Fca6UgXXFHQcs1bH7iZ cajBmKKZHqnVEuWfNVRl1R1Gjy6K6q7g3na3jussFeXIZSmAAsrgi7bxi Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: EUl6qq6ARy6MSlLWmfSK1Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: oJoI53wJQ9i0iCLJM1tGwg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11390"; a="55392571" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,291,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="55392571" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Mar 2025 09:36:22 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rhm7ZPKlTa2IlUavWJ1/8w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: DhbKubTZS4mCy61fzpj6KA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,291,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="163370727" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Mar 2025 09:36:20 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tzI7U-00000007ryy-3XWs; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 19:36:16 +0300 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 19:36:16 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Zijun Hu , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Danilo Krummrich , Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] device property: Add a note to the fwnode.h Message-ID: References: <20250331163227.280501-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250331163227.280501-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 07:32:27PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Add a note to the fwnode.h that the header should not be used > directly in the leaf drivers, they all should use the higher > level APIs and the respective headers. I re-read it and it's ambiguous, I fixed this in v2 that has been just sent. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko