From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of: Warn when of_property_read_bool() is used on non-boolean properties
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 21:10:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4a2t9tRaiPSAovk@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdU=QR-JLgEHKWpsr6SbaZRc-Hz9r91JfpP8c3n2G-OjqA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 07:35:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 8:42 PM Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> > The use of of_property_read_bool() for non-boolean properties is
> > deprecated. The primary use of it was to test property presence, but
> > that has been replaced in favor of of_property_present(). With those
> > uses now fixed, add a warning to discourage new ones.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
>
> Thanks for your patch, which is now commit c141ecc3cecd7647 ("of:
> Warn when of_property_read_bool() is used on non-boolean properties")
> in dt-rh/for-next.
>
> I have bisected a failure in secondary CPU bring-up on R-Car H1 (quad
> Cortex-A9 MPCore) to this commit:
>
> Detected Renesas R-Car Gen1 r8a7779 ES1.0
> smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
> -CPU1: thread -1, cpu 1, socket 0, mpidr 80000001
> -CPU1: Spectre v2: using BPIALL workaround
> -CPU2: thread -1, cpu 2, socket 0, mpidr 80000002
> -CPU2: Spectre v2: using BPIALL workaround
> -CPU3: thread -1, cpu 3, socket 0, mpidr 80000003
> -CPU3: Spectre v2: using BPIALL workaround
> -smp: Brought up 1 node, 4 CPUs
> -SMP: Total of 4 processors activated (2000.00 BogoMIPS).
> +CPU1: failed to come online
> +CPU2: failed to come online
> +CPU3: failed to come online
> +smp: Brought up 1 node, 1 CPU
> +SMP: Total of 1 processors activated (500.00 BogoMIPS).
> CPU: All CPU(s) started in SVC mode.
>
> Reverting this commit on top of my work tree fixes the issue, too.
> However, I do not see how this commit could impact CPU bring-up?
>
> I added debug code to of_property_read_bool(), to print all look-ups.
> I only saw a few before CPU bring-up, nothing relevant:
>
> NR_IRQS: 16, nr_irqs: 16, preallocated irqs: 16
> +OF: of_property_read_bool(interrupt-controller): 1
> rcu: srcu_init: Setting srcu_struct sizes based on contention.
> +OF: of_property_read_bool(interrupt-controller): 1
> sched_clock: 64 bits at 250MHz, resolution 4ns, wraps every 4398046511102ns
> clocksource: arm_global_timer: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff
> max_cycles: 0x7350b89c29, max_idle_ns: 881590431910 ns
> Switching to timer-based delay loop, resolution 4ns
> +OF: of_property_read_bool(interrupt-controller): 1
> +OF: of_property_read_bool(always-on): 0
> Console: colour dummy device 80x30
> printk: legacy console [tty0] enabled
>
> Perhaps something shifted in the code layout? The obvious suspects
> (shmobile_boot_* and shmobile_smp_* asm code, secondary_startup(),
> addresses in arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-scu.c) are still at the
> same addresses as before...
>
> Anyone with a clue?
Hmm... You meant the patch 2 troubles this?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-14 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-09 19:42 [PATCH 0/2] device property: Warn on (of|fwnode|device)_property_read_bool() for non-boolean properties Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-01-09 19:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] device property: Split property reading bool and presence test ops Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-01-10 15:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-11 10:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-13 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-01-15 7:23 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-01-09 19:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] of: Warn when of_property_read_bool() is used on non-boolean properties Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-01-11 10:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-14 18:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-01-14 19:10 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-01-14 19:19 ` Rob Herring
2025-01-15 11:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-03-10 13:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-01-13 8:58 ` [PATCH 0/2] device property: Warn on (of|fwnode|device)_property_read_bool() for " Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4a2t9tRaiPSAovk@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox