From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
To: "zhenglifeng (A)" <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, robert.moore@intel.com,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, mario.limonciello@amd.com,
ray.huang@amd.com, pierre.gondois@arm.com,
acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
zhanjie9@hisilicon.com, lihuisong@huawei.com,
hepeng68@huawei.com, fanghao11@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] cpufreq: CPPC: Support for autonomous selection in cppc_cpufreq
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:03:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4kYq7JChZ+6ZKpx@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad254dd8-24f7-4aee-9f68-5d1890e87c81@huawei.com>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 04:01:08PM +0800, zhenglifeng (A) wrote:
> > @@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ static int shmem_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> > {
> > struct cppc_perf_caps cppc_perf;
> > u64 numerator;
> > + bool auto_sel; <--- Not needed.
> >
> > int ret = cppc_get_perf_caps(cpudata->cpu, &cppc_perf);
> > if (ret)
> > @@ -420,7 +421,7 @@ static int shmem_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> > if (cppc_state == AMD_PSTATE_ACTIVE)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - ret = cppc_get_auto_sel_caps(cpudata->cpu, &cppc_perf); <--- Not needed.
> > + ret = cppc_get_auto_sel(cpudata->cpu, &auto_sel); <--- Not needed.
> > if (ret) { <--- Not needed.
> > pr_warn("failed to get auto_sel, ret: %d\n", ret); <--- Not needed.
> >
>
> If auto_sel is not supported, this function will return 0 after getting
> fail. But after removing cppc_get_auto_sel(), this function will return
> -EOPNOTSUPP by setting. Is this alright?
This is not ok. The shmem_init_perf() function shouldn't error out if
the auto-selection register is not supported.
Also, looking at the function, there may be a few additional cleanups
required in that one. For now, let us just retain the
cppc_get_auto_sel() and cppc_set_auto_sel() functions as you have done
in this patchset.
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-16 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-13 12:20 [PATCH v4 0/6] Support for autonomous selection in cppc_cpufreq Lifeng Zheng
2025-01-13 12:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] ACPI: CPPC: Add IS_OPTIONAL_CPC_REG macro Lifeng Zheng
2025-01-14 13:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-01-15 7:52 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-13 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_get_reg_val and cppc_set_reg_val function Lifeng Zheng
2025-01-14 17:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-01-15 8:10 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-13 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] ACPI: CPPC: Add macros to generally implement registers getting and setting functions Lifeng Zheng
2025-01-14 17:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-01-15 8:58 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-15 11:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-01-16 1:12 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-13 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] ACPI: CPPC: Refactor register value get and set ABIs Lifeng Zheng
2025-01-13 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] ACPI: CPPC: Add autonomous selection ABIs Lifeng Zheng
2025-01-14 18:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-01-15 9:16 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-13 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] cpufreq: CPPC: Support for autonomous selection in cppc_cpufreq Lifeng Zheng
2025-01-15 14:51 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-01-16 1:26 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-16 6:13 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-01-16 8:01 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-16 14:33 ` Gautham R. Shenoy [this message]
2025-01-16 11:39 ` Russell Haley
2025-01-17 3:11 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-17 14:30 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-01-20 3:15 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-20 14:49 ` Pierre Gondois
2025-01-20 17:44 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-01-21 2:42 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-23 16:46 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2025-01-23 17:05 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-01-24 3:53 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-24 14:18 ` srinivas pandruvada
2025-02-05 6:13 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-24 14:32 ` Russell Haley
2025-02-05 6:13 ` zhenglifeng (A)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4kYq7JChZ+6ZKpx@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com \
--to=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=fanghao11@huawei.com \
--cc=hepeng68@huawei.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox