Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] mailbox: pcc: Refactor and simplify check_and_ack()

[Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>]

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 08:19:32PM +0800, lihuisong (C) wrote:
> 
> 在 2025/3/11 20:08, Sudeep Holla 写道:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 07:47:39PM +0800, lihuisong (C) wrote:
> > > 在 2025/3/6 0:38, Sudeep Holla 写道:
> > > > The existing check_and_ack() function had unnecessary complexity. The
> > > > logic could be streamlined to improve code readability and maintainability.
> > > > 
> > > > The command update register needs to be updated in order to acknowledge
> > > > the platform notification through type 4 channel. So it can be done
> > > > unconditionally. Currently it is complicated just to make use of
> > > > pcc_send_data() which also executes the same updation.
> > > > 
> > > > In order to simplify, let us just ring the doorbell directly from
> > > > check_and_ack() instead of calling into pcc_send_data(). While at it,
> > > > rename it into pcc_chan_check_and_ack() to maintain consistency in the
> > > > driver.
> > > LGTM except for some trivial,
> > > Acked-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    drivers/mailbox/pcc.c | 37 +++++++++++++------------------------
> > > >    1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> > > > index b3d133170aac7f8acfd1999564c69b7fe4f6d582..90d6f5e24df7e796f8c29705808eb6df2806c1f2 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> > > > @@ -117,8 +117,6 @@ struct pcc_chan_info {
> > > >    static struct pcc_chan_info *chan_info;
> > > >    static int pcc_chan_count;
> > > > -static int pcc_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data);
> > > > -
> > > >    /*
> > > >     * PCC can be used with perf critical drivers such as CPPC
> > > >     * So it makes sense to locally cache the virtual address and
> > > > @@ -288,33 +286,24 @@ static int pcc_mbox_error_check_and_clear(struct pcc_chan_info *pchan)
> > > >    	return 0;
> > > >    }
> > > > -static void check_and_ack(struct pcc_chan_info *pchan, struct mbox_chan *chan)
> > > > +static void pcc_chan_check_and_ack(struct pcc_chan_info *pchan)
> > > How about use pcc_chan_ack?
> What do you think of this?

Sure I can update, just retained what was there and made it consistent
with other functions.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep