From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] iommu: Add iommu_init/deinit_device() paired functions
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 14:20:30 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHok3ls1dP7168Mn@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bcb5f03-77c9-116e-c436-9d0af21fa82a@linux.intel.com>
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 07:31:38PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> I revisited this patch. And I still have some questions.
>
> On 5/20/23 2:42 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > -/*
> > - * Remove the iommu_group from the struct device. The attached group must be put
> > - * by the caller after releaseing the group->mutex.
> > - */
> > +/* Remove the iommu_group from the struct device. */
> > static void __iommu_group_remove_device(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct iommu_group *group = dev->iommu_group;
> > struct group_device *device;
> > + mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
> > lockdep_assert_held(&group->mutex);
>
> By moving mutex_lock/unlock into this helper, above
> lockdep_assert_held() is unnecessary.
Woops, got it thanks
> The group->devices_kobj was increased on the probe device path twice:
>
> - iommu_init_device() - allocate the group
> - iommu_group_add_device() - add device to the group
>
> But, on the release path, it seems that group->devices_kobj is only
> decreased once.
>
> Did I overlook anything? Otherwise, the group will never be released,
> right?
Your answer was right, when VFIO uses add/remove device it doesn't do
init_device.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-02 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-19 18:42 [PATCH v2 00/10] Consolidate the probe_device path Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] iommu: Have __iommu_probe_device() check for already probed devices Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-21 8:17 ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-22 12:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu: Use iommu_group_ref_get/put() for dev->iommu_group Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-21 8:18 ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] iommu: Inline iommu_group_get_for_dev() into __iommu_probe_device() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-21 8:19 ` Baolu Lu
2023-06-02 17:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] iommu: Simplify the __iommu_group_remove_device() flow Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-21 9:08 ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-22 8:35 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-05-29 19:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] iommu: Add iommu_init/deinit_device() paired functions Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-21 11:09 ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-21 11:31 ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-22 2:31 ` Baolu Lu
2023-06-02 17:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu: Move the iommu driver sysfs setup into iommu_init/deinit_device() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-22 0:51 ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] iommu: Do not export iommu_device_link/unlink() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-22 0:52 ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] iommu: Always destroy the iommu_group during iommu_release_device() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-22 1:43 ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] iommu: Split iommu_group_add_device() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-22 2:34 ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-25 5:37 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] iommu: Avoid locking/unlocking for iommu_probe_device() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-22 2:39 ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-25 5:37 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZHok3ls1dP7168Mn@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox