public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] iommu: Add iommu_init/deinit_device() paired functions
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 14:20:30 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHok3ls1dP7168Mn@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bcb5f03-77c9-116e-c436-9d0af21fa82a@linux.intel.com>

On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 07:31:38PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> I revisited this patch. And I still have some questions.
> 
> On 5/20/23 2:42 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > -/*
> > - * Remove the iommu_group from the struct device. The attached group must be put
> > - * by the caller after releaseing the group->mutex.
> > - */
> > +/* Remove the iommu_group from the struct device. */
> >   static void __iommu_group_remove_device(struct device *dev)
> >   {
> >   	struct iommu_group *group = dev->iommu_group;
> >   	struct group_device *device;
> > +	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
> >   	lockdep_assert_held(&group->mutex);
> 
> By moving mutex_lock/unlock into this helper, above
> lockdep_assert_held() is unnecessary.

Woops, got it thanks

> The group->devices_kobj was increased on the probe device path twice:
> 
> - iommu_init_device() - allocate the group
> - iommu_group_add_device() - add device to the group
> 
> But, on the release path, it seems that group->devices_kobj is only
> decreased once.
> 
> Did I overlook anything? Otherwise, the group will never be released,
> right?

Your answer was right, when VFIO uses add/remove device it doesn't do
init_device.

Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-02 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-19 18:42 [PATCH v2 00/10] Consolidate the probe_device path Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] iommu: Have __iommu_probe_device() check for already probed devices Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-21  8:17   ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-22 12:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu: Use iommu_group_ref_get/put() for dev->iommu_group Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-21  8:18   ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] iommu: Inline iommu_group_get_for_dev() into __iommu_probe_device() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-21  8:19   ` Baolu Lu
2023-06-02 17:17     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] iommu: Simplify the __iommu_group_remove_device() flow Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-21  9:08   ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-22  8:35   ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-05-29 19:33     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] iommu: Add iommu_init/deinit_device() paired functions Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-21 11:09   ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-21 11:31   ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-22  2:31     ` Baolu Lu
2023-06-02 17:20     ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu: Move the iommu driver sysfs setup into iommu_init/deinit_device() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-22  0:51   ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] iommu: Do not export iommu_device_link/unlink() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-22  0:52   ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] iommu: Always destroy the iommu_group during iommu_release_device() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-22  1:43   ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] iommu: Split iommu_group_add_device() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-22  2:34   ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-25  5:37   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-05-19 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] iommu: Avoid locking/unlocking for iommu_probe_device() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-22  2:39   ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-25  5:37   ` Tian, Kevin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZHok3ls1dP7168Mn@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox