From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Call _REG when saving/restoring PCI state
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 15:21:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHpPOzT0nm+vddPq@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230602031122.18350-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
[+cc Rafael, Len, linux-acpi]
Hi Mario,
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 10:11:22PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> ASMedia PCIe GPIO controllers connected to AMD SOC fail functional tests
> after returning from s2idle. This is because the BIOS checks whether the
> OSPM has called the _REG method to determine whether it can interact with
> the OperationRegion assigned to the device.
"s2idle" is a Linux term; I'd prefer something that we can relate to
the ACPI spec.
Maybe a pointer to the specific function in the driver that has a
problem? Based on the patch, I assume the driver uses some control
method that looks at PCI config space?
> To fix this issue, call acpi_evaluate_reg() when saving and restoring the
> state of PCI devices.
Please include the spec citation: ACPI r6.5, sec 6.5.4. The URL has
changed in the past and may change in the future, but the name/section
number will not.
> Link: https://uefi.org/htmlspecs/ACPI_Spec_6_4_html/06_Device_Configuration/Device_Configuration.html#reg-region
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index e38c2f6eebd4..071ecba548b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -1068,6 +1068,12 @@ static inline bool platform_pci_bridge_d3(struct pci_dev *dev)
> return acpi_pci_bridge_d3(dev);
> }
>
> +static inline int platform_toggle_reg(struct pci_dev *dev, int c)
> +{
> + return acpi_evaluate_reg(ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->dev),
> + ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PCI_CONFIG, c);
> +}
You never check the return value, so why return it?
The function actually doesn't *toggle*; it connects or disconnects
based on "c".
This looks like it only builds when CONFIG_ACPI=y?
> /**
> * pci_update_current_state - Read power state of given device and cache it
> * @dev: PCI device to handle.
> @@ -1645,6 +1651,9 @@ static void pci_restore_ltr_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> int pci_save_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> int i;
> +
> + platform_toggle_reg(dev, ACPI_REG_DISCONNECT);
I would expect these to be in the PM code near the power state
transitions, not in the state save/restore code. These functions
*are* used during suspend/resume, but are used in other places as
well, where we probably don't want _REG executed.
Cc'd Rafael and PM folks, who can give much better feedback.
> /* XXX: 100% dword access ok here? */
> for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> pci_read_config_dword(dev, i * 4, &dev->saved_config_space[i]);
> @@ -1790,6 +1799,8 @@ void pci_restore_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> pci_enable_acs(dev);
> pci_restore_iov_state(dev);
>
> + platform_toggle_reg(dev, ACPI_REG_CONNECT);
> +
> dev->state_saved = false;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_restore_state);
> @@ -3203,6 +3214,7 @@ void pci_pm_init(struct pci_dev *dev)
> pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_STATUS, &status);
> if (status & PCI_STATUS_IMM_READY)
> dev->imm_ready = 1;
> + platform_toggle_reg(dev, ACPI_REG_CONNECT);
> }
>
> static unsigned long pci_ea_flags(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 prop)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-02 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230602031122.18350-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
2023-06-02 20:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2023-06-02 21:57 ` [PATCH] PCI: Call _REG when saving/restoring PCI state Limonciello, Mario
2023-06-04 11:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-06-05 18:33 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-06-06 15:27 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-06-04 11:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZHpPOzT0nm+vddPq@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox