From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Iain Lane <iain@orangesquash.org.uk>,
Shyam-sundar S-k <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/3] PCI/ACPI: Use device constraints to decide PCI target state fallback policy
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 07:30:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMx+4CxT/b8ShiWR@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230804010229.3664-4-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 08:02:29PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Since commit 9d26d3a8f1b0 ("PCI: Put PCIe ports into D3 during suspend")
> PCIe ports from modern machines (>=2015) are allowed to be put into D3 by
> storing a value to the `bridge_d3` variable in the `struct pci_dev`
> structure.
>
> pci_power_manageable() uses this variable to indicate a PCIe port can
> enter D3.
> pci_pm_suspend_noirq() uses the return from pci_power_manageable() to
> decide whether to try to put a device into its target state for a sleep
> cycle via pci_prepare_to_sleep().
>
> For devices that support D3, the target state is selected by this policy:
> 1. If platform_pci_power_manageable():
> Use platform_pci_choose_state()
> 2. If the device is armed for wakeup:
> Select the deepest D-state that supports a PME.
> 3. Else:
> Use D3hot.
>
> Devices are considered power manageable by the platform when they have
> one or more objects described in the table in section 7.3 of the ACPI 6.5
> specification.
>
> When devices are not considered power manageable; specs are ambiguous as
> to what should happen. In this situation Windows 11 leaves PCIe
> ports in D0 while Linux puts them into D3 due to the above mentioned
> commit.
>
> In Windows systems that support Modern Standby specify hardware
> pre-conditions for the SoC to achieve the lowest power state by device
> constraints in a SOC specific "Power Engine Plugin" (PEP) [2] [3].
> They can be marked as disabled or enabled and when enabled can specify
> the minimum power state required for an ACPI device.
>
> When it is ambiguous what should happen, adjust the logic for
> pci_target_state() to check whether a device constraint is present
> and enabled.
> * If power manageable by ACPI use this to get to select target state
> * If a device constraint is present but disabled then choose D0
> * If a device constraint is present and enabled then use it
> * If a device constraint is not present, then continue to existing
> logic (if marked for wakeup use deepest state that PME works)
> * If not marked for wakeup choose D3hot
...
> +/**
> + * acpi_get_lps0_constraint - get any LPS0 constraint for a device
> + * @dev: device to get constraint for
> + *
> + * If a constraint has been specified in the _DSM method for the device,
> + * and the constraint is enabled return it. If the constraint is disabled,
> + * return 0. Otherwise, return -ENODEV.
> + */
I believe you get a kernel-doc warning. Always test kernel doc with
scripts/kernel-doc -v -none -Wall ...your file...
...
> +/**
> + * acpi_pci_device_constraint - determine if the platform has a contraint for the device
> + * @dev: PCI device to check
> + * @result (out): the constraint specified by the platform
> + *
> + * If the platform has specified a constraint for a device, this function will
> + * return 0 and set @result to the constraint.
> + * Otherwise, it will return an error code.
> + */
Ditto.
...
> +int acpi_pci_device_constraint(struct pci_dev *dev, int *result)
> +{
> + int constraint;
> +
> + constraint = acpi_get_lps0_constraint(&dev->dev);
> + pci_dbg(dev, "ACPI device constraint: %d\n", constraint);
Does it make sense before the below check? Why can we be interested in the
_exact_ negative values? (Note that non-printing is already a sign that either
we don't call this or have negative constraint.)
> + if (constraint < 0)
> + return constraint;
> + *result = constraint;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-04 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-04 1:02 [PATCH v9 0/3] Fix wakeup problems on some AMD platforms Mario Limonciello
2023-08-04 1:02 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] ACPI: Add comments to clarify some #ifdef statements Mario Limonciello
2023-08-04 1:02 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Adjust constraints logic building Mario Limonciello
2023-08-04 4:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-04 1:02 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] PCI/ACPI: Use device constraints to decide PCI target state fallback policy Mario Limonciello
2023-08-04 4:30 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-08-04 4:37 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-08-04 4:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-04 13:17 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-08-04 15:56 ` Limonciello, Mario
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZMx+4CxT/b8ShiWR@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=iain@orangesquash.org.uk \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox