From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A80C001DE for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 05:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231379AbjHDF4n (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2023 01:56:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54092 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230245AbjHDF4m (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2023 01:56:42 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FFAE3A87; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 22:56:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1691128601; x=1722664601; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=rzakUJWPnPS3f3ldJfSEhOcAq/FjOCfS+YHo0F1hwLw=; b=newRIlsCIG8STJjiGaxOg/lcOjRv+b6TWH6ilUaorC+n9+uIRX948Bda N0azRjx17wJCvsP3yuh1yVqA7QnR0QQ+64pm5OrEe+eP1c/fkX3EuuUQe 0YSv/tDKp6AvXxYdCx+TjtGsdwtvfFGgVnX9jSqGX5ULGgfmpYbamL3wj xNz2gFe8/zKNbNUHRgxBrR2HQHl5JNdWgb3OkKkRi/UUUYg2UPvOPtmhM zw0Vhp353HhX1S5Uset7k/eCLWJ7KnOu89y1w6uKPKpbF2uOQgBubvsDL LYBxaAiiBJumlfrw5z0FzkVAMjrCjbR+9zgf1C60wvjGof9sLRndoBh+E g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10791"; a="349665944" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,254,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="349665944" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Aug 2023 22:56:40 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10791"; a="903744022" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,254,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="903744022" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Aug 2023 22:56:33 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qRnna-00CWIR-0J; Fri, 04 Aug 2023 08:56:30 +0300 Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 08:56:29 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sunil V L Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , Anup Patel , Marc Zyngier , Bjorn Helgaas , Robert Moore , Haibo Xu , Andrew Jones , Conor Dooley , Atish Kumar Patra Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 09/21] RISC-V: cacheflush: Initialize CBO variables on ACPI systems Message-ID: References: <20230803175916.3174453-1-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> <20230803175916.3174453-10-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230803175916.3174453-10-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 11:29:04PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote: > Using new interface to get the CBO block size information in > RHCT, initialize the variables on ACPI platforms. ... > #include > +#include Can you keep it sorted (to some extent)? > +#include What do you need this for? > #include -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko