From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0E4C04FE0 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2023 18:21:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235687AbjHHSVo (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2023 14:21:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49486 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235038AbjHHSVT (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2023 14:21:19 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A86048DCE2; Tue, 8 Aug 2023 10:31:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1691515904; x=1723051904; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=bekUQmkLqiuuNXeg0IhE6M5EXx5phX87uLqdbgvDBug=; b=LzIZY7LXvL95dYeOdFA9WJLOWFIa62K76K1AKJGDb5ldaLmSElhdGc+B 41et612Dqr4L+/93K9nWiTNe+WyoJ4FJe69CmW58MtQTr2mjmlN61fgmB 3ZlIIO55bMNHinEtLeUWmwY4cyOa034tW8BYJK+iV4+PNqCV9qpHGZu00 tNDX2vxjSIdpyrPK+qbxnlOnTyQkqJjbRJqf3HyQxXOuJjE3D/3tPsuuO kiNTlCtbq+DwHBRyxZgQxVyWF3o2w4XbaS26wdqYsJBb90/Hn9VnSi4zq pxPv6RLXWLti3zonNxVlRKXWpznHSIJ7iYcM+8fyRL4KZ+K4bnyzIEH1q Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10795"; a="434668092" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,156,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="434668092" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Aug 2023 06:11:22 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10795"; a="731407306" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,156,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="731407306" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Aug 2023 06:11:16 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qTMUS-009BJF-2O; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 16:11:12 +0300 Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 16:11:12 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Sunil V L , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , Anup Patel , Marc Zyngier , Bjorn Helgaas , Robert Moore , Haibo Xu , Andrew Jones , Conor Dooley , Atish Kumar Patra Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 05/21] arm64: PCI: Migrate ACPI related functions to pci-acpi.c Message-ID: References: <20230803175916.3174453-6-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> <20230807224152.GA274647@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230807224152.GA274647@bhelgaas> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 05:41:52PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 11:29:00PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote: > > The functions defined in arm64 for ACPI support are required > > for RISC-V also. To avoid duplication, copy these functions > > to common location. > > I assume this is a "move" (not a copy) and the code being moved isn't > being changed. Not sure is proper -M -C will help to recognize that on the patch generation. Maybe -M 50 (or another carefully chosen percentage) can help. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko