From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD52B186; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 01:35:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139CEC15; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 01:35:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB5E33F6C4; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 01:35:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 09:35:08 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: James Clark , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sudeep Holla , suzuki.poulose@arm.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mike Leach , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/7] coresight: stm: Move ACPI support from AMBA driver to platform driver Message-ID: References: <20231201062053.1268492-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <20231201062053.1268492-7-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <0adc3a16-0fc4-2a25-cd48-4667881b9490@arm.com> <7825dcd4-94e1-7a5f-b388-90e748dfc47f@arm.com> <81cad3a6-a080-424c-ad0b-0f08c4fe51a2@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <81cad3a6-a080-424c-ad0b-0f08c4fe51a2@arm.com> On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:50:19AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > Something like this works ? > > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c > index 3387ebc9d8ab..2b6834c4cac6 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c > @@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ static int __stm_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *res, void *dev_caps) > pm_runtime_put(dev); > > dev_info(&drvdata->csdev->dev, "%s initialized\n", > - (char *)dev_caps); > + dev_caps ? (char *)dev_caps: "STM"); > return 0; > > cs_unregister: Yes, looks good to me. -- Regards, Sudeep