From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=8bytes.org header.i=@8bytes.org header.b="Zz3X/iBi" Received: from mail.8bytes.org (mail.8bytes.org [IPv6:2a01:238:42d9:3f00:e505:6202:4f0c:f051]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4004F0; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 01:57:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from 8bytes.org (p4ffe1e67.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.254.30.103]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.8bytes.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BC441A4799; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:57:09 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=8bytes.org; s=default; t=1701079029; bh=CHHOkEMTPlg6Xp1XqOEpVungIbDgk3x5eaYRFc6OMvA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Zz3X/iBiBVM3gKoGzcPRKsUrKzGKvDDxddIItBGIrI9aqPyU/yKP2kaAn5hQux0XS JrGbXWO93UFSecEJJPItKQCoLPlqLJKODxmzQq2CxV0v5EB+UMbDItB/LOuFI1M9ib z+Gi8Z2yssva5mirEt3Hj9QyfmvAxPMoPvl3swdWsmpi9h6A7qY3fXWvBIOVpb+HTX r95P85qXK0wfnz2uG+IFAsmHPCYNs/7j/sHzCAHsd8rv35jiZbiFp+3nYeQIcn670e bZm8zYouky0yAKTY4eTcWL+se5W9w03k9+hGmn+QElmPFJ6NYMKymmQztvlugfbQ6J fwBa0QYmVCNag== Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:57:08 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Robin Murphy , will@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org, andre.draszik@linaro.org, quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Avoid more races around device probe Message-ID: References: <16f433658661d7cadfea51e7c65da95826112a2b.1700071477.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 01:05:58PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > I'm fine with this as some hacky backport, but I don't want to see > this cross-layer leakage left in the next merge window. > > ie we should still do my other series on top of and reverting this. > > I've poked at moving parts of it under probe and I think we can do > substantial amounts in about two more series and a tidy a bunch of > other stuff too. Applied this for v6.7. Before I am going to apply any series on-top I want to see you and Robin agree on a general direction for this moving forward. Regards, Joerg