From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Daniel Scally" <djrscally@gmail.com>,
"Heikki Krogerus" <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
"Julia Lawall" <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Cosmin Tanislav" <cosmin.tanislav@analog.com>,
"Mihail Chindris" <mihail.chindris@analog.com>,
"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
"Tomislav Denis" <tomislav.denis@avl.com>,
"Marek Vasut" <marex@denx.de>,
"Olivier Moysan" <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>,
"Fabrice Gasnier" <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>,
"Lad Prabhakar" <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
"Dmitry Baryshkov" <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
"Marijn Suijten" <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
"Marius Cristea" <marius.cristea@microchip.com>,
"Ibrahim Tilki" <Ibrahim.Tilki@analog.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/15] iio: adc: stm32: Use device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:45:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZdM_P93vVIrBHkmg@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240217164249.921878-10-jic23@kernel.org>
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 04:42:43PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>
> Switching to the _scoped() version removes the need for manual
> calling of fwnode_handle_put() in the paths where the code
> exits the loop early. In this case that's all in error paths.
>
> Note this includes a probable fix as in one path an error message was
> printed with ret == 0.
>
> Took advantage of dev_err_probe() to futher simplify things given no
> longer a need for the goto err.
...
> const struct stm32_adc_info *adc_info = adc->cfg->adc_info;
I believe with
struct device *dev = &indio_dev->dev;
you can make the below neater.
Also see some side notes.
> - struct fwnode_handle *child;
> const char *name;
> int val, scan_index = 0, ret;
> bool differential;
> u32 vin[2];
...
> if (!ret) {
Not a fan of this pattern, below we have two different patterns for the cases
like this :-(
> + if (strlen(name) >= STM32_ADC_CH_SZ)
> + return dev_err_probe(&indio_dev->dev, -EINVAL,
> + "Label %s exceeds %d characters\n",
> + name, STM32_ADC_CH_SZ);
> +
> strscpy(adc->chan_name[val], name, STM32_ADC_CH_SZ);
> ret = stm32_adc_populate_int_ch(indio_dev, name, val);
> if (ret == -ENOENT)
> continue;
> else if (ret)
This 'else' is redundant.
> + return ret;
> + } else if (ret != -EINVAL)
This also...
> + return dev_err_probe(&indio_dev->dev, ret, "Invalid label\n");
...if you first do like
if (ret && ret != -EINVAL)
return dev_err_probe(...);
if (!ret) {
Another option
if (ret) {
if (ret != -EINVAL)
return dev_err_probe(...);
} else {
...
> differential = false;
> ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(child, "diff-channels", vin, 2);
ARRAY_SIZE()?
> /* diff-channels is optional */
...
> if (!ret) {
> + if (vin[0] != val || vin[1] >= adc_info->max_channels)
> + return dev_err_probe(&indio_dev->dev, -EINVAL,
> + "Invalid channel in%d-in%d\n",
> + vin[0], vin[1]);
> } else if (ret != -EINVAL) {
> - dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "Invalid diff-channels property %d\n", ret);
> - goto err;
> + return dev_err_probe(&indio_dev->dev, ret,
> + "Invalid diff-channels property\n");
> }
As per above?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-17 16:42 [PATCH v4 00/15] device property / IIO: Use cleanup.h magic for fwnode_handle_put() handling Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] device property: Move fwnode_handle_put() into property.h Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-19 8:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-20 6:55 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] device property: Add cleanup.h based fwnode_handle_put() scope based cleanup Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-19 8:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-20 6:55 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] iio: temp: ltc2983: Use __free(fwnode_handle) to replace fwnode_handle_put() calls Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-19 13:52 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-24 11:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] device property: Introduce device_for_each_child_node_scoped() Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-19 8:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-20 6:59 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] iio: adc: max11410: Use device_for_each_child_node_scoped() Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-19 13:54 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] iio: adc: mcp3564: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-adc5: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] iio: adc: rzg2l_adc: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] iio: adc: stm32: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-19 11:45 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2024-02-24 12:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] iio: adc: ti-ads1015: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] iio: adc: ti-ads131e08: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] iio: addac: ad74413r: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-19 13:55 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] iio: dac: ad3552r: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-19 11:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] iio: dac: ad5770r: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-17 16:42 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] iio: dac: ltc2688: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-19 11:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-19 15:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-19 13:49 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-19 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] device property / IIO: Use cleanup.h magic for fwnode_handle_put() handling Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-19 15:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-24 11:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-28 14:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZdM_P93vVIrBHkmg@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Ibrahim.Tilki@analog.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=cosmin.tanislav@analog.com \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=marius.cristea@microchip.com \
--cc=mihail.chindris@analog.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=olivier.moysan@foss.st.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tomislav.denis@avl.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox