From: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
To: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Robert Moore" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
"Guo Ren" <guoren@kernel.org>, "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@rivosinc.com>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
"Greentime Hu" <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
"Baoquan He" <bhe@redhat.com>,
"Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>,
"Sami Tolvanen" <samitolvanen@google.com>,
"Jisheng Zhang" <jszhang@kernel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Chen Jiahao" <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>,
"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"Evan Green" <evan@rivosinc.com>,
"Samuel Holland" <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
"Anup Patel" <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Yuntao Wang" <ytcoode@gmail.com>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Alison Schofield" <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 10:54:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZeasjVWuyeiAlF8y@sunil-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <799dcc07f41c2357328e9778fbbded7818af34a7.1706603678.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:32:00AM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Add acpi_numa.c file to enable parse NUMA information from
> ACPI SRAT and SLIT tables. SRAT table provide CPUs(Hart) and
> memory nodes to proximity domain mapping, while SLIT table
> provide the distance metrics between proximity domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h | 15 +++-
> arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c | 5 --
> arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 4 +-
> arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 -
> drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 3 +-
> include/linux/acpi.h | 4 +
> 8 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> index 7dad0cf9d701..e0a1f84404f3 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -61,11 +61,14 @@ static inline void arch_fix_phys_package_id(int num, u32 slot) { }
>
> void acpi_init_rintc_map(void);
> struct acpi_madt_rintc *acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(int cpu);
> -u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu);
> +static inline u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu)
> +{
> + return acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(cpu)->uid;
> +}
> +
> int acpi_get_riscv_isa(struct acpi_table_header *table,
> unsigned int cpu, const char **isa);
>
> -static inline int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; }
> void acpi_get_cbo_block_size(struct acpi_table_header *table, u32 *cbom_size,
> u32 *cboz_size, u32 *cbop_size);
> #else
> @@ -87,4 +90,12 @@ static inline void acpi_get_cbo_block_size(struct acpi_table_header *table,
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> +int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu);
> +void acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void);
> +#else
> +static inline int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; }
> +static inline void acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void) { }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
> +
> #endif /*_ASM_ACPI_H*/
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> index f71910718053..5d3e9cf89b76 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -105,3 +105,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT) += compat_vdso/
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_64BIT) += pi/
> obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += acpi.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA) += acpi_numa.o
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> index e619edc8b0cc..040bdbfea2b4 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -191,11 +191,6 @@ struct acpi_madt_rintc *acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(int cpu)
> return &cpu_madt_rintc[cpu];
> }
>
> -u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu)
> -{
> - return acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(cpu)->uid;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * __acpi_map_table() will be called before paging_init(), so early_ioremap()
> * or early_memremap() should be called here to for ACPI table mapping.
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..493642a61457
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * ACPI 6.6 based NUMA setup for RISCV
> + * Lots of code was borrowed from arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> + *
> + * Copyright 2004 Andi Kleen, SuSE Labs.
> + * Copyright (C) 2013-2016, Linaro Ltd.
> + * Author: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Intel Corporation.
> + *
> + * Reads the ACPI SRAT table to figure out what memory belongs to which CPUs.
> + *
> + * Called from acpi_numa_init while reading the SRAT and SLIT tables.
> + * Assumes all memory regions belonging to a single proximity domain
> + * are in one chunk. Holes between them will be included in the node.
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: NUMA: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/memblock.h>
> +#include <linux/mmzone.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/topology.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/numa.h>
> +
> +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
> +
> +int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return acpi_early_node_map[cpu];
> +}
> +
> +static inline int get_cpu_for_acpi_id(u32 uid)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> +
> + for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++)
> + if (uid == get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu))
> + return cpu;
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init acpi_parse_rintc_pxm(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> + const unsigned long end)
Please check alignment.
> +{
> + struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa;
> + int cpu, pxm, node;
> +
> + if (srat_disabled())
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + pa = (struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *)header;
> + if (!pa)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_RINTC_ENABLED))
> + return 0;
> +
> + pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
> + node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
> +
> + /*
> + * If we can't map the UID to a logical cpu this
> + * means that the UID is not part of possible cpus
> + * so we do not need a NUMA mapping for it, skip
> + * the SRAT entry and keep parsing.
> + */
> + cpu = get_cpu_for_acpi_id(pa->acpi_processor_uid);
> + if (cpu < 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + acpi_early_node_map[cpu] = node;
> + pr_info("SRAT: PXM %d -> HARTID 0x%lx -> Node %d\n", pxm,
> + cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpu), node);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void __init acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + /*
> + * In ACPI, SMP and CPU NUMA information is provided in separate
> + * static tables, namely the MADT and the SRAT.
> + *
> + * Thus, it is simpler to first create the cpu logical map through
> + * an MADT walk and then map the logical cpus to their node ids
> + * as separate steps.
> + */
> + acpi_table_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, sizeof(struct acpi_table_srat),
> + ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_RINTC_AFFINITY,
> + acpi_parse_rintc_pxm, 0);
> +
Alignment here as well.
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++)
> + early_map_cpu_to_node(i, acpi_numa_get_nid(i));
> +}
> +
> +/* Callback for Proximity Domain -> logical node ID mapping */
> +void __init acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa)
> +{
> + int pxm, node;
> +
> + if (srat_disabled())
> + return;
> +
> + if (pa->header.length < sizeof(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity)) {
> + pr_err("SRAT: Invalid SRAT header length: %d\n",
> + pa->header.length);
Can we merge these into single line?
> + bad_srat();
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_RINTC_ENABLED))
> + return;
> +
> + pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
> + node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
> +
> + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> + pr_err("SRAT: Too many proximity domains %d\n", pxm);
> + bad_srat();
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 4f73c0ae44b2..a2cde65b69e9 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -281,8 +281,10 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> setup_smp();
> #endif
>
> - if (!acpi_disabled)
> + if (!acpi_disabled) {
> acpi_init_rintc_map();
> + acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes();
Is it not possible to fill up both in single parsing of MADT?
> + }
>
> riscv_init_cbo_blocksizes();
> riscv_fill_hwcap();
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> index 519b6bd946e5..b188d83d1ec4 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const un
> if (hart == cpuid_to_hartid_map(0)) {
> BUG_ON(found_boot_cpu);
> found_boot_cpu = true;
> - early_map_cpu_to_node(0, acpi_numa_get_nid(cpu_count));
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -111,7 +110,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const un
> }
>
> cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpu_count) = hart;
> - early_map_cpu_to_node(cpu_count, acpi_numa_get_nid(cpu_count));
> cpu_count++;
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> index 503abcf6125d..1f0462cef47c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,8 @@ int __init srat_disabled(void)
> return acpi_numa < 0;
> }
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH) || \
> + defined(CONFIG_RISCV)
Please check alignment. Or make it single line if fits in 100 chars.
Also, it looks it covers most of the architectures now. Is it possible
to simplify / remove the condition? I hope IA64 is removed now?
May be you need to update the comment at #endif too.
Thanks
Sunil
> /*
> * Callback for SLIT parsing. pxm_to_node() returns NUMA_NO_NODE for
> * I/O localities since SRAT does not list them. I/O localities are
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index a65273db55c6..be78a9d28927 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -269,8 +269,12 @@ acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa) { }
>
> int acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV
> +void acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa);
> +#else
> static inline void
> acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa) { }
> +#endif
>
> #ifndef PHYS_CPUID_INVALID
> typedef u32 phys_cpuid_t;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-05 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-31 2:31 [PATCH 0/4] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V Haibo Xu
2024-01-31 2:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPICA: SRAT: Add RISC-V RINTC affinity structure Haibo Xu
2024-02-12 13:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-18 7:18 ` Haibo Xu
2024-01-31 2:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: NUMA: Add handler for SRAT " Haibo Xu
2024-03-05 4:41 ` Sunil V L
2024-03-05 8:42 ` Haibo Xu
2024-01-31 2:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT Haibo Xu
2024-03-05 5:24 ` Sunil V L [this message]
2024-03-05 9:54 ` Haibo Xu
2024-03-05 10:06 ` Sunil V L
2024-01-31 2:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA Haibo Xu
2024-01-31 9:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-01 2:58 ` Haibo Xu
2024-02-01 5:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-05 5:26 ` Sunil V L
2024-03-05 8:32 ` Haibo Xu
2024-03-05 2:30 ` [PATCH 0/4] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V Haibo Xu
2024-03-05 4:44 ` Sunil V L
2024-03-05 7:42 ` Haibo Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZeasjVWuyeiAlF8y@sunil-laptop \
--to=sunilvl@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=chenjiahao16@huawei.com \
--cc=cleger@rivosinc.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=evan@rivosinc.com \
--cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=haibo1.xu@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=xiaobo55x@gmail.com \
--cc=ytcoode@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox