From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DEB363137; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 18:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711131407; cv=none; b=bEYyYRYGZ3gjm/zAif5Jq9Qi51xTaHIDiAMRbUonv91J7y9kn0vW0Ufu0QgmX4M9a+37354vI3Se2U97neA6aqt9AINzXQj3fx+g3O40ke++Rh+0p7P9FiwwfDaJ+EXGgPZwS9sIctYRO7Vus4HxASgDu2vRzWuldaaL2HSFVv4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711131407; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CSb/2Xd0kjyrzXVz+VuBtqsWEMSEE9CK8ZtmpNce0Hw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AkwSFl9fTlBbt1FGDZC/nRtD6IlIYTdBNzHszXuah7tJK0vdGrz408pZuqibHPn/E4SN+CRrXYD0cjIJEl4LgMo1Nda5ilg6U0aK/Xjctb2y7JjvrZ8nkv0Hu8DdKw/Ctao5sg6aQoEM1jy60a2leeGZtA3zoy53yaC9HjX8DcM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=axSqTKNk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="axSqTKNk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1711131406; x=1742667406; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=CSb/2Xd0kjyrzXVz+VuBtqsWEMSEE9CK8ZtmpNce0Hw=; b=axSqTKNkTnEVbovQV5wPy2pEYWljKjAVmd1nu4G+XVERUIL9KwuuMXIw UWcio8egxcmzvTO5JuYxx6rLWEsOTjkjHXzoEDo4rpsQaGeBo2WYQ+VlC kwSprKDIeAj9pklpZDD3oBiwIrrEUqKsgr71lLchnG68JSLzuOpVLYGJK WZ+HkuLM+YrR3JOFe+ws2ysdqKxj6sq7Wr4AjK+5lCBQJnuyDrwOqi5YI hztT38hmECrTpLcl0DRFSzMID4JeYWEsWnA4iQe/n+BK1lWQIGto7P/vr pF9TVrZK75fjbCeueOUxcs1xJ99FWuwG7mxm+RyKTYg5yjA50vxfXOLSO g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11020"; a="28671897" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,146,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="28671897" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2024 11:16:45 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11020"; a="914750928" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,146,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="914750928" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2024 11:16:41 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rnjRW-0000000FEYM-2S1Q; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:16:38 +0200 Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:16:38 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sui Jingfeng Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean Subject: Re: [PATCH] software node: Implement device_get_match_data fwnode callback Message-ID: References: <20240318234222.1278882-1-sui.jingfeng@linux.dev> <9ced20e0-dfbd-4337-b5df-223b7baffd9e@linux.dev> <9644da91-f367-4083-a3e4-4d0677c8cbca@linux.dev> <6bf102a4-6419-4083-8918-4f7c76cfa9a1@linux.dev> <8afe3f27-fc8e-4c20-ba28-74a0a2937e55@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8afe3f27-fc8e-4c20-ba28-74a0a2937e55@linux.dev> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 02:12:14AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote: > On 2024/3/23 02:05, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Besides that, the kernel project rule is "we do not add > > the dead (unused) code". > > This rule is good an correct and I admit. > > But the problem is that it is chicken-and-egg problem, > it probably have at least two user now. Then show them! Convert in the same series and show that. > it's possible that it will gain more users in the future. > > But if you reject everybody from now, then it is zero. As a no-user patch, yes, I reject this. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko