From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6CE615B14D; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712084329; cv=none; b=EkNhbcs99e7k++Flr6O2Dvq1X6XNQNBQgcNzBVO3l43jM5KNoztC+Oc6q32ynJGGl150OYxtok9S/IK61X7xWOYEJr2+zZQWKI5yOj16qMExccd+UX1ebzCuOia5C/85C9IHahKsMn4Tg6+hknrwcxeEe7YSsZ3G2Ij/P1dZess= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712084329; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pfhTEjnGoQZBXhOvCxvyf4F/kDdqOCTHbhRdXUe7DvE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=n9Ynj0BV5leIA5UkibyJ+GZ7i27TNvKGNmK4obIzuyYdfQ/HvQygyk8YmN8rfX9TadasStaMxIm4wMN7rMCLBI7mcoxR9vFI0yVsY9mJfwZwrA8W7Xa6UcODpxmfA2q1bJMUOtwlIgf/7znfCZ6yBl5Eiyi6XvBb2JpyWbYVAQ4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=BuFwNfgn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="BuFwNfgn" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1712084328; x=1743620328; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=pfhTEjnGoQZBXhOvCxvyf4F/kDdqOCTHbhRdXUe7DvE=; b=BuFwNfgnKX+LesH7SCzK4M8dndjBejME5PwZW6sUoqvaP9N+ZwrP51cD fjY7UznsRJoLHnaE1K+5xCnFzq0S3SGEfqlPjwwDTQkpjeeA6zFj+70xy 1H/+LTH2/d8uAe06sHWtNyrlG0U2vG7WxgjBa/xKdpyxZiAOQpi8gcj9z YDGK+siy+nstjcvMXOzyD6uebJIQ4rlq6z6rF+gZYAPGBTbxY3GjxGF7C XyrS7mPbhYuTDu39d0sjK5HPy0ooPlDTkww3cOYBPIkjk5xaDGmiBf+WW VcR130pBOnv/fUJIlx5X4ZFUOYSXRK+SFmfydCQxzYnWgJVtbwKfY17Ua Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 6uCN5v8sQa2xVT9j3JS4NA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Ucc9FJmVQMieEGXdO5cz8g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11032"; a="7179084" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,175,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="7179084" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Apr 2024 11:58:47 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11032"; a="915150459" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,175,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="915150459" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Apr 2024 11:58:44 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rrjLH-00000000uJT-0cxb; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 21:58:43 +0300 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 21:58:42 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI: LPSS: Prepare for SPI code cleanup Message-ID: References: <20240402152952.3578659-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240402152952.3578659-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 06:28:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > An ad-hoc cleanup followed by preparation for SPI code cleaning. > The latter will be done in the next kernel cycle to avoid conflicts. Thinking more about these two, it might be even possible to put them as amendments for v6.9-rc3, but I'm fine to have them for v6.10-rc1. Just speaking out my thoughts, whatever is better for you is good for me. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko