From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7435A1E502; Tue, 21 May 2024 14:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716300016; cv=none; b=s/3Besofhh+5A55A23DjvIRCECGOI7VCRqeVPGMcPreDMOG9n+CKCVgstjpU7t6YSBGrL5/BM/IryA0N3mDPVW+tdaRaNBgx6li7cX5zzOASWuFgssOSvZmL4hW8tLecDJ9LrLk5XCxxr9qBXcz2Qhmq36KCMzQc9nn9L4UOWN4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716300016; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1fC1qPkHIzJeKGkFtyxB3WvFL7tvcX3u9xMga4DyzdM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qKru6iv4CpOO3307B67R5QuLsfIUY7F6/Qrm59snCVg7gW4+omeprvfTmWJiIxZONuuavzIpmDwdZtKgyiUOjDRwVT3LdRrzFgd6HpBolLZnC0EeLsYXXot0wdmaTv+u0gDxTcPHsdL3o8MMwugFxzTWP2fwVb5eQQSuvzvb76c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=GED+tXhJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="GED+tXhJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1716300015; x=1747836015; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1fC1qPkHIzJeKGkFtyxB3WvFL7tvcX3u9xMga4DyzdM=; b=GED+tXhJWaBT6iq2YZ9TiYJpplDYEpVn+Mag5IVZTOCjVMC2xHjIjNx2 uPArEkvz/+lmz0zndvnUaKJBpvUoReuuqHE80J3nHub5bEfMcTWm8UFrQ n9WiH3o/JwcEHjIWwk+itGXZm7HuFP03KAThvVv9DTDc2v8cTititeDvg /xQUxdx/FWAKVRUswEcC0kiYS4+bFy0kgd1SNAibkrWc4BUxSB82xB24n aRZ/B4Vc/MVOTKLqH4IRxeCkRUJvwxgJekjce1DNPRZqLKQoeGS/hBh26 2qr1VshiPpywsqHp1swwG1PEqjtlFjBrksgJRsOvC4YwfK+N1jDOnECGm w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: iytRVh3hQdabtI2Ydo+yrA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5KIGelyUS2KVGTaU8gpB2Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11078"; a="16334075" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,177,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="16334075" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2024 07:00:14 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: D+4sqOvIR1S+ndvCyQ4I8Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: CHCjpVRuSsq5mWwTi2UUpA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,177,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="33531814" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2024 07:00:12 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1s9Q2D-00000009fnx-0Pr9; Tue, 21 May 2024 17:00:09 +0300 Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 17:00:08 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Linux regressions mailing list , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Laura Nao , mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, brgl@bgdev.pl, kernel@collabora.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , "kernelci.org bot" Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: acpi: Move ACPI device NULL check to acpi_can_fallback_to_crs() Message-ID: References: <20240513095610.216668-1-laura.nao@collabora.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 12:01:17PM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 13.05.24 12:02, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 11:56:10AM +0200, Laura Nao wrote: > >> Following the relocation of the function call outside of > >> __acpi_find_gpio(), move the ACPI device NULL check to > >> acpi_can_fallback_to_crs(). > > > > Thank you, I'll add this to my tree as we have already the release happened. > > I will be available after v6.10-rc1 is out. > > Hmm, what exactly do you mean with that? It sounds as you only want to > add this to the tree once -rc1 is out -- which seems likely at this > point, as that patch is not yet in -next. If that's the case allow me to > ask: why? Because: - that's the policy of Linux Next (do not include what's not supposed to be merged during merge window), Cc'ed to Stephen to clarify, it might be that I'm mistaken - the process of how we maintain the branches is to have them based on top of rc1 (rarely on other rcX and never on an arbitrary commit from vanilla > I'd say it should be fixes rather sooner than later, as other > people might run into this as well and then have to deal with bisecing, > reporting, ... Yes, but we have a process during merge window, it's special and different from vX.Y-rc1..vX.Y times. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko