From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DE661922FE; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 13:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723211186; cv=none; b=qEZjgpWzTVV4zsdUmveVqufrUNGq2hVvX2ftBAd7Pt8Gvfi5vsNA6HkkMEaSqPrY2ZLy2dKIbOihDwo90UbR0ph1ynaGNbS50A1hlTkS7/WZ7yeTo09491l5JoBBALnkN3eKJSEAzsMGSwdS5UHohJ4F3zVl/WQ3fzoooNxbT/0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723211186; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Lj8I2YczpRsBV40NdoxOlV7wrxbePVYqrhgx8G3OmJo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PKdEQG40H7tO+fIaaHzHveG2f7bFKa9iZeDNaYD6ftjVsfeQUFNsTHnFuh1TtYBq7y5wkUIFLdTxLCBeqGSAR1FxAycr+pK/C/zw/CXFo21nCvxRr1OBZIj7tfXw9xYfDKTbaohpfxlkCthX2Bfbpng96iUgpSVlz2ztcVPb+tE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=lIUPkj1D; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="lIUPkj1D" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1723211184; x=1754747184; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Lj8I2YczpRsBV40NdoxOlV7wrxbePVYqrhgx8G3OmJo=; b=lIUPkj1DJdUvrdSFlhogQ8UA3sHTOO0OqMfboDwj8QxfWAwK9ZJUO7ET JYVCb1VPw44TW9UB2BmYpHMHDZckoa/RVpseh5KqZUGhUJxYh4CnajKgx hJNhzrSz/beHWmlYvNNw/+9Z8WPgN7UsFmKrX8gP3ACE/LcEJhW0OZ6vR W7oGk+L57tbcxJKrDRyxAg3pYd16GsMOLoaMURD7IX6Mqgoca3gUY1W7O BMcQ/FTQbG3KccmSoUG6lWmFPCZyJvz7R4rQgrBjJuYrmKOvFgTqVIwbq 5u9SwKsUaTlYC0q+IyOhIdHERRYWPeEiO4l9F3z0qxCv9jQWRB4vOHXXe g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: N5d95tKOTkyU56Nq2mnzQw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: d3+7hgkUQPWB8UkGX9GBbQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11158"; a="21267380" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,276,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="21267380" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Aug 2024 06:46:24 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: xUV0/ViAQ+qeSL8ISxUVlg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: DSSgbbbDQlaFdRenmTm7AQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,276,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="88206956" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Aug 2024 06:46:21 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1scPwg-0000000DQnq-2IVN; Fri, 09 Aug 2024 16:46:18 +0300 Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 16:46:18 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon , Hanjun Guo , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sudeep Holla , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI/IORT: Switch to use kmemdup_array() Message-ID: References: <20240606165005.3031490-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <3a1e0ffe-db11-d18f-db33-881df7d9b18d@huawei.com> <2edd3b72-24a4-8b19-8738-cc82dc4fae6c@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 01:52:48PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 03:16:34PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > Ah, sorry, I missed this. Since it doesn't look like a fix, I guess it's > fine to go in 6.12. No, it's definitely not a fix, it's a simple cleanup. Hence v6.12 is quite okay, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko