public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: <lenb@kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
	<zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>, <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
	<yubowen8@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Return failure if entry method is not buffer or integer type
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 17:25:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a577bfd3-a4b8-4d06-b95b-a78b2916b8a4@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jg5RGi-+i3LtwK6U8m+_C5Rs4OuRTBLTGi6g0aRq3LBQ@mail.gmail.com>


在 2025/10/23 18:07, Rafael J. Wysocki 写道:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 11:25 AM lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> 在 2025/10/22 3:34, Rafael J. Wysocki 写道:
>>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 11:38 AM Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>> According to ACPI spec, entry method in LPI sub-package must be buffer
>>>> or integer. However, acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() regeards it as success
>>>> and treat it as an effective LPI state.
>>> Is that the case?  AFAICS, it just gets to the next state in this case
>>> and what's wrong with that?
>> The flatten_lpi_states() would consider the state with illegal entry
>> method sub-package as a valid one
>> if the flag of this state is enabled(ACPI_LPI_STATE_FLAGS_ENABLED is set).
>> And then cpuidle governor would use it because the caller of
>> acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe() also don't see the return value.
> So the problem appears to be that lpi_state increments in every step
> of the loop, but it should only increment if the given state is valid.
Yes,
So set the flag of the state with illegal entry method sub-package to 
zero so that this invalid LPI state will be skiped in 
flatten_lpi_states(), ok?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-24  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-29  9:37 [PATCH v1 0/9] ACPI: processor: idle: enhance and cleancode for cpuidle state Huisong Li
2025-09-29  9:37 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] ACPI: processor: idle: raise up log level when evaluate LPI failed Huisong Li
2025-10-21 19:29   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-23  9:09     ` lihuisong (C)
2025-09-29  9:37 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Return failure if entry method is not buffer or integer type Huisong Li
2025-10-21 19:34   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-23  9:25     ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-23 10:07       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-24  9:25         ` lihuisong (C) [this message]
2025-10-26 12:35           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-29  9:37 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Return failure when get lpi_state->arch_flags failed Huisong Li
2025-10-21 19:36   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-23  9:59     ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-23 10:09       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-24  9:27         ` lihuisong (C)
2025-09-29  9:37 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Move the initialization of state->flags to acpi_processor_setup_cstates Huisong Li
2025-10-22 14:49   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-29  9:37 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Add the verification of processor FFH LPI state Huisong Li
2025-10-21 19:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-23 10:17     ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-23 10:35       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-24  9:40         ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-26 12:40           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-27  1:42             ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-27 12:28               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-28 12:45                 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-28 14:10                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-29  9:37 ` [PATCH v1 6/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Do not change power states if get power info failed Huisong Li
2025-10-21 19:49   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-24  9:10     ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-26 12:34       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-27  3:01         ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-27 12:31           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-29  9:37 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Remove died codes about the verification of cstate count Huisong Li
2025-10-21 19:51   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-23 10:19     ` lihuisong (C)
2025-09-29  9:37 ` [PATCH v1 8/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Redefine setup idle functions to void Huisong Li
2025-09-29  9:37 ` [PATCH v1 9/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Redefine acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_dev " Huisong Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a577bfd3-a4b8-4d06-b95b-a78b2916b8a4@huawei.com \
    --to=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=yubowen8@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox