From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1142526D4DD for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 22:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757716107; cv=none; b=st4wvdmHeqAGgjlqNSFmfsojx7SE9tYmLiAUgM5O9Inih2ubaHuEPHmNsSy9NTkUak5NJeF6HX5YVDc5nQ66Uu5b+AG90LWEF5gxzadCqkmsv+Tuj5D21oEhQ2YOunD4zUAqM5VUI8bAtI63cezdTiUubJGwS2j2nkGoqgMmWxg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757716107; c=relaxed/simple; bh=e6mzgxhiG8kK8Y1Gmfux4Bc513Ya67T9ITtiJe4Ehs0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=eKruMd5oyKydVHM4INSOTHkDN5ykPbkQC4HZLZD6GjaqWWnbqHkne8UMK0PUU4VqDtsD/bsBnVGLabitN45sRPaTPcmFkiglmdQ8QRT/Y4UJ1PTvgv2w0pawVzr/pFC18NKj8GzbR3IZKKx/G3fjOCo2Sf8X3zFEM2NYAKTt5aI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=Xm+3mahz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="Xm+3mahz" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=e6mz gxhiG8kK8Y1Gmfux4Bc513Ya67T9ITtiJe4Ehs0=; b=Xm+3mahzWOOxiVVIAga+ iSHfGVRqvJ5PFCGLaL/GzUjX4YNb/hPFuCvnTGNl0HAzseT3fxq608VUQlaaTqct b21GFfV8Ea6MzDTHNNNQUJg/QZaOotINmZHSrFAdd1BNxqFatFklS+1N9Ho9+FDJ +ZtHsX6GPNPO4SUmj8PEl/u+02gQb3a8GGbXsDGQc0ZieTKmFBFhZ52rDM5+Mxcv 60kivSuurKFEu1qkK6+nXimSBJ3KWgMDIMHiK2aNHbJr5fok49a8dljDiqbTRjBn Q/y7ceiHzl1FeKhkdQovn69mZ3McAOecvIldHVzAyJm/qfuulrt+slQKkXfwc7tA 0Q== Received: (qmail 1504370 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2025 00:28:23 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 13 Sep 2025 00:28:23 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@UR/rK6I+npcgAQnoAHJ8AC93OVDMgFWg Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 00:28:22 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Jean-Fran=C3=A7ois?= Lessard , Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Danilo Krummrich , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node iterators Message-ID: References: <20250902190443.3252-1-jefflessard3@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QSvRZOkrwrDINmRa" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --QSvRZOkrwrDINmRa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andi, > > > > It might be good to have an immutable branch for me from i2c core. > > > > Wolfram, can you provide a such if no objections? > > >=20 > > > Sure thing, I can do that. But there is still discussion on patch 1, = so > > > I will wait for an outcome there. > >=20 > > But it seems that the discussion can be implemented in a followup? > > I think we are not in hurry anyway, so let see if it settles down soon. >=20 > I pushed out an immutable branch now: >=20 > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/immutable= /scoped_fwnode_child >=20 > Please have a look if I got the tags correct. Once confirmed, I will > merge it into i2c/for-mergewindow and Andy can pull it as well. Andy, did you pull this immutable branch already? --QSvRZOkrwrDINmRa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmjEnoYACgkQFA3kzBSg Kbb9Og//ZzoS9CwadDc/npU9PDNiW9zqCCQ0/ib6AkExeYbcn84OVIPDIBvWrJgN od9fKs7x0Uxe1RRrxRQzqnk8LEdktydGxj0kA53M95QfBKzYFQHhVSeltDQdVvEq zIeaz1Hwsu4OdPqDHxOZ1eTB5I1LNcIVMPV19zb9qCdu7dcOwD3/ApFKZfmiJAb/ ZOR9yfuLQXsvzfOj1HJFG38l5SXjRkjh0RPqMWYEXhTv1Tw2Vx6mI5fuIuI2/q0L SrsfTZGeLlNEmxPJZpCUspA7wgXc6Q4O7Y+RNkPT9MY8nKTtsgRBopCBHzi9OvRo JiOYhLIGdL7bNTSx/In9k9fCvDm/hFxRn4s8beWjSocNyaVyHLAEf1i5lQtz8r8l /gZgeeupR1iAEigDzhzodNoLmU5LXNZ62Z0PIq7cGQ4hXDq+Ekp2vkEZtE6GrdcO HcJtlLDcO+iDJZmohNm9tJ3uBibt7Qg0pajdGTDQ+J4ZosXmoCD5xmD8qVWy8mzw YPG8EC4A0l4LMlPGS20K4uLyeGx+tVovPf3VPMAdF5E78A1YeWss93FsNV2XGivl ZWJc4kQ+jXriQREkIGzvCsvyRupFBSedhZ3t1Gq2JE6nNgpA/5G/dwnmXhzkng6w D1WG2+UZ086rV5p/8ZbPKHoWZ1fZ3dyswq1VmkgJLZXK0q5xqes= =fqwy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QSvRZOkrwrDINmRa--