From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08434129E6E; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 14:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758031788; cv=none; b=PrlVVBggUshQkkkmIj3woldhUn8KU8Zh+dHBOV8yOHWskDfkWDOqBZC8RA3cF5fn7JEiDcqsvxM5cGx9cfcAGTH45uDh5K9j/UFGUxEEWiUsvQ1zWtbHN6lVtAGvGQtTtIO8l4qVwCaOtUQGxVSLi5DpJiK+mRjN07v4KzsG1Qg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758031788; c=relaxed/simple; bh=c3hdJCePaCWo+2BYA/qk6Bwz0gVTkkoU44/V5dyaDhs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AGmvY74EX8y/Dgu+3y57dvFxDPmGlwpY0Vkq5DhTZzm6kGaKaFbu/oZjsB7IFXAXYThgXmrQMj1tiUjS6WbPzeXMvGD4oY2MbOjV2VqDMHdJVOa4foj0F/ii70dflWmRwRQRbsqfzw93wEV/Z3TIxa0nqAhC/yHSwFpwbnvFxbw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=MV1a4xA0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="MV1a4xA0" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1758031788; x=1789567788; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=c3hdJCePaCWo+2BYA/qk6Bwz0gVTkkoU44/V5dyaDhs=; b=MV1a4xA0deYhASnxWGau+QviKLYTsKY+V9NO0DY9JUCCNfjhVrfJyPXR CieP1CCYXWYW4m3YDdnzDbFR2pe9f32XMyicP+S195BDo5GedukOWiRyd No64IbtsIpruRpFcdxAMJ0JF+pfuijw7mTPinOxtlgLYkOyUwthulorDa WAau4YSqiLWtnTfgqnAzAFlr1uSIbvnUJVO+Pt5+Qs1ZDnZwcD9B0BIAt XW20U1vOnSi5x/Dz6Uxe3Kc07Rvn5bJhdkVpoLImuQ5NusiVtKhESd/zS 4B9iDLnR4gDE1KvJG4kFZqLlcon6o4svq1SxcbSJgPnvjULfgZW3zN1Lh A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /CgABUPlSz6W2YKsdfgbbw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: QFZEObFxTbCxYvDPRxt8wg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11555"; a="70563350" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,269,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="70563350" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Sep 2025 07:09:47 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XkqJQqM1Tt+Q/RSLDKcHXQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: KArXQVdoT+6uGSMFE86lAA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,269,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="175731890" Received: from bergbenj-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO kekkonen.fi.intel.com) ([10.245.245.177]) by fmviesa010-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Sep 2025 07:09:43 -0700 Received: from kekkonen.localdomain (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by kekkonen.fi.intel.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 428D8121EFF; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:09:41 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:09:41 +0300 Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo From: Sakari Ailus To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux ACPI , LKML , Mika Westerberg , Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI: property: Two fixes, more documentation and a cleanup Message-ID: References: <5922318.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5922318.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki> Hi Rafael, On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 08:20:03PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi All, > > This is an update of > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/5046661.31r3eYUQgx@rafael.j.wysocki/ > > A user report regarding "ACPI: \: Can't tag data node" error messages in dmesg > made me look at the ACPI property code and I've found a couple of issues in > it. > > Also, it took me some time to figure out why the code was doing what it was > doing, so I decided to add some comments explaining it. > > Finally, there's always something that can be cleaned up in every piece of > kernel code. > > Hence, this series. For the set: Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus Tested-by: Sakari Ailus -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus