public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] ACPI: property: Return present device nodes only on fwnode interface
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 10:58:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMpqQKhcBNWv5PN9@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916160129.3955410-4-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 07:01:18PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> fwnode_graph_get_next_subnode() may return fwnode backed by ACPI device
> nodes and there has been no check these devices are present in the system,
> unlike there has been on fwnode OF backend. In order to provide consistent
> behaviour towards callers, add a check for device presence by introducing
> a new function acpi_get_next_present_subnode(), used as the
> get_next_child_node() fwnode operation that also checks device node
> presence.

...

> +/**
> + * acpi_get_next_present_subnode - Return the next present child node handle for a fwnode
> + * @fwnode: Firmware node to find the next child node for.
> + * @child: Handle to one of the device's child nodes or a null handle.
> + * Like acpi_get_next_subnode, but the device nodes returned by

acpi_get_next_subnode()

> + * acpi_get_next_present_subnode() are guaranteed to be present.
> + */

Kernel-doc validator is not happy: Missing Return section.

> +static struct fwnode_handle *
> +acpi_get_next_present_subnode(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> +			      struct fwnode_handle *child)
> +{
> +	do {
> +		child = acpi_get_next_subnode(fwnode, child);
> +	} while (is_acpi_device_node(child) &&
> +		 !acpi_device_is_present(to_acpi_device_node(child)));
> +
> +	return child;
> +}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-17  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-16 16:01 [PATCH 00/14] Align availability checks on fwnode child node enumeration Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 01/14] ACPI: property: Use ACPI functions in acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint() only Sakari Ailus
2025-09-17  7:17   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-17 11:50     ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 02/14] ACPI: property: Make acpi_get_next_subnode() static Sakari Ailus
2025-09-17  7:18   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 03/14] ACPI: property: Return present device nodes only on fwnode interface Sakari Ailus
2025-09-17  7:58   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 04/14] property: Drop DEVICE_DISABLED flag in fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() Sakari Ailus
2025-09-17  8:39   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-17 12:19     ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 05/14] property: Drop DEVICE_DISABLED flag in fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_count() Sakari Ailus
2025-09-18 19:23   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 06/14] property: Document that fwnode API returns available nodes Sakari Ailus
2025-09-22  8:03   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 07/14] driver core: Use fwnode_for_each_child_node() instead Sakari Ailus
2025-09-23  5:43   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 08/14] net: lan966x: " Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 09/14] Input: touch-overlay - " Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 10/14] media: thp7312: " Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 11/14] leds: " Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 12/14] leds: Use fwnode_get_next_child_node() instead Sakari Ailus
2025-09-23  5:46   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-23  8:29     ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 13/14] property: Drop functions operating on "available" child nodes Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 14/14] spi: cadence: Remove explicit device node availability check Sakari Ailus
2025-09-17  7:07 ` [PATCH 00/14] Align availability checks on fwnode child node enumeration Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aMpqQKhcBNWv5PN9@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox