From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41E5018027; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:00:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758621623; cv=none; b=tM9lD9Fowejt6NVtU4oLSrC8K5V7lRQ+m2gASPM0shERYTjtYYWVX3Wk4Ty1J9dBePPDlydznNfBE7Slu8WKRasPMop7g41+eCMgeUMmfNzU+SFPOcKM16ZVdvn75BNIVkXLKT1pT8M37IgF1Pnqeu2s5OhNFkshmbI3j39rSKo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758621623; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZmLDLSUhIgyW2E8XpVDH7PtXAL41rLjhjSwjbacf3Jw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=d4lnoi9Mqx8CfrJMaP12RDr9e8N3JE4kXe2qQ31PT0eq7ICwppQTC03wCz4UuXUXqyStIqi44reH+iAuxGZT8Vw3orvrSHBtBFoEFMoxpsPYWcCZcrzb6CGXu10jASLbJLuA9R5X+eoY9Nu6eKjKNWVTWLc9OY/f8+mmbcOtnec= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YjNHRCyo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YjNHRCyo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E520C4CEF5; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:00:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758621622; bh=ZmLDLSUhIgyW2E8XpVDH7PtXAL41rLjhjSwjbacf3Jw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YjNHRCyoSIySI2JhgkojZyWPyLtiZig84JvxQ9PEE0iM67VwKEdkxgjrz7Sl+LLTA oNbfPYeLB/6BqR03oGyAlFOH5iTo3mngIYeR6I3Wcl1O3m8ZX5Jt99G0GOXCaA/lZa IA+9u5g6CggSnHPVLE77lZXdPpsEf8RKY8tkiF537g1CcQNhN//sk5kmD643Rb5ouQ pFL1yRhqCWOOeYRpt+174zdvVW+SenPm+0C5FrxfnJGC6JS0UmUlf6tH8V2tVXZvDe gHgZ9GjdWr8a8pePNZSPrAuKti1KPLl84otJjeXKoRT/6XMjwrKunapbB0cx5X70+V 7VzrsPInmPLng== Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 11:00:16 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Marc Zyngier Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Mark Rutland , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Saravana Kannan , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sven Peter , Janne Grunau , Suzuki K Poulose , James Clark , Jonathan Cameron Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/26] genirq: Add support for percpu_devid IRQ affinity Message-ID: References: <20250922082833.2038905-1-maz@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250922082833.2038905-1-maz@kernel.org> Hi Marc, On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 09:28:07AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > This is the third version of this series, originally posted at [1], > which aims at allowing percpu_devid interrupt requests on the basis of > an affinity mask. See the original submission for the details of why > this is a desirable outcome. FWIW, I backported this to 6.12 and tested it on a DT-based Android device with heterogeneous PMUs and pNMI enabled. Perf appears to work correctly, the pNMIs are configured as expected and the affinities all look good to me. Tested-by: Will Deacon Will