Linux ACPI
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Haotian Zhang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: property: Fix fwnode refcount leak in acpi_fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint()
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:42:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRSczeIXvymTQN3D@kekkonen.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0gs8nor-fgwcY8x4bkd9Swiu8yJn9296U7RHRnQUYDpdA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Rafael, Haotian,

On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 02:48:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 8:50 AM Haotian Zhang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
> >
> > acpi_fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint() calls fwnode_get_parent() to obtain the
> > parent fwnode but returns without calling fwnode_handle_put() on it. This
> > leads to a fwnode refcount leak and prevents the parent node from being
> > released properly.
> >
> > Call fwnode_handle_put() on the parent fwnode before returning to
> > fix the leak.
> >
> > Fixes: 3b27d00e7b6d ("device property: Move fwnode graph ops to firmware specific locations")
> > Signed-off-by: Haotian Zhang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/property.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> > index 1b997a5497e7..7f8790e8dc4e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> > @@ -1714,6 +1714,7 @@ static int acpi_fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> >         if (fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "reg", &endpoint->id))
> >                 fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "endpoint", &endpoint->id);
> >
> > +       fwnode_handle_put(port_fwnode);

I'd add a newline here.

> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > --
> 
> Andy, Sakari, this looks like a genuine fix to me, any comments?

Thanks for cc'ing me.

On ACPI fwnode_handle_put() is a nop, and presumably a parent of an ACPI
node is an ACPI node as well. So this doesn't change fwnode refcounting but
is nevertheless a good thing to do for API usage correctness.

Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-11  7:50 [PATCH] ACPI: property: Fix fwnode refcount leak in acpi_fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint() Haotian Zhang
2025-11-12 13:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-12 14:42   ` Sakari Ailus [this message]
2025-11-12 20:25     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aRSczeIXvymTQN3D@kekkonen.localdomain \
    --to=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox