From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 791813043DD; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769529643; cv=none; b=VKcLhP+BT0WrsvqzHoDiCLw0fkoXtBNMqsVi45uAW5CWAS/mGjucwaDTmSLRvEmuoJ7pD83wrGulWZpUX4bK92xDSmo9OffMWAsyLXYJu9BNNb4S1pXV65v64RLf2NUAbhD1Jq8Ts+MG9PpgUqcLWZA8IyNQMDs+CjuyFHC4nLY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769529643; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GL3r4IUch63E1Hws6G4NyZXWNGB0D5+RIlS/11RY3wE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gwdrWGzhgE/g7gJJNKdO3ZPEgVjtjrFPwK1rPfcy8bcd2VKhFBfTv3kod4wqVDeTyWHhq8Tk75oThc/SJkuAlmu65sjvOVhIEkWun+KWws5fGPFNRbj0is3kqWL3yeb9s1FOpAJtU3xJII9fLALepl0n8RtJrAqy1e9VKaK5z00= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=a+NmGJWw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="a+NmGJWw" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B3E7C16AAE; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:00:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769529643; bh=GL3r4IUch63E1Hws6G4NyZXWNGB0D5+RIlS/11RY3wE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=a+NmGJWwoJZyOaNEy/B4GduCpN1U1HaNnZnmac9IdYSuotNZsWMxqH9Md0e7oR0Ot pL0DM0p4zyI8DzGoF0LC/iUB2OWPfoLu1UaxUjVgmA+2/sHXqqUjvxCix/YIvr+JPh zq9ulEST1QOwE9H4wdq45x+fD3DBXCcVM2HU6P8x5jXCp3RpfThiyBKVtTxQedSeF7 JbShNuba7/mDH4AmJ25mTbwUV1tZCuUqiGmhtT+hRgvgHw1d6PJ1ho3rRIkvKtQ5pY lZksbsfHPkRkruYYLmYMqwiwTqpFsSlQR1tmGafJ9jmyOZB/aP0Z3+zN5R6vm5U1II mM8KWcTH9g4HQ== Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:00:39 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Peng Fan Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" , Sudeep Holla , Jassi Brar , Beleswar Padhi , Andrew Davis , Yuntao Dai , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "mailbox@lists.linux.dev" Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailbox: Clean up the usage of mailbox_client.h Message-ID: References: <20260127-mailbox-v1-v1-1-cf15d7cece48@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 02:47:33PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] mailbox: Clean up the usage of mailbox_client.h > > > > Hi Sudeep, > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailbox: Clean up the usage of mailbox_client.h > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 07:02:53AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > > > > From: Peng Fan > > > > > > > > mailbox_client.h is should be used by consumer drivers, not > > mailbox > > > > provider. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan > > > > --- > > > > drivers/mailbox/bcm-flexrm-mailbox.c | 1 - > > > > drivers/mailbox/cv1800-mailbox.c | 1 - > > > > drivers/mailbox/omap-mailbox.c | 1 - > > > > drivers/mailbox/pcc.c | 1 - > > > > 4 files changed, 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c index > > > > > > > > > 22e70af1ae5d14e6e8c684fe032c2864f6ae4d6c..6ca84596e7637114f6 > > > 6d32a95d12 > > > > c863e942b756 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c > > > > @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ > > > > #include > > > > #include > > > > #include -#include > > > > #include > > > > #include > > > > > > > > > > There is a call to mbox_bind_client() in pcc.c that is declared in > > > linux/mailbox_client.h > > > > Thanks for raising this. > > Check again. > > include/acpi/pcc.h includes mailbox_client.h > I see, I missed that. I’m fine with removing it, but the commit message doesn’t really apply here since it’s getting included anyway. I don’t see much point in removing it, but I’m fine either way. -- Regards, Sudeep