From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 812042BE644; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 19:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772047086; cv=none; b=uCg8Yxm2vDh51w+CSGEuwJn6rVUnzmzpta8iccl/RLC5A2A8KdNXH803cFV2C1WsdxHasxhtvQl3aptfB8DDSW9U1smZ2FCNahp4Zlk3g6OGoRaTQVVuvRCVBrKZo5nZZhMX1Yu47ZAs6RJkfHB4o6p1TUGqzhCFCl/bGbPcW58= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772047086; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vRI+TIfMM43B2wJ1QoUqWhWEMmxSYNbHtXEcyc854xc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Zrny014/PSUCEX48iFAhlpwvWcvH3z1ki7ObyXXWpwgCiyq3w4V89rof1cbdttwUiYHnUbRdngI9+Z8IvZYN0CSDnHupHJ8CmtR+4RhM7Eke1vLR/u3t8//ymk8RIWBKmPfKHvH7IPwebWVKrdVYuq2UTdgtgx5wwtpqAb+2ccM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=mftJYv6N; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="mftJYv6N" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1772047084; x=1803583084; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=vRI+TIfMM43B2wJ1QoUqWhWEMmxSYNbHtXEcyc854xc=; b=mftJYv6NXwkARqCjbHMNmnk7uzh/US7BFC5yRMXRFPycI1Ysf24gWbX+ garyrQcJt1nUqd6owM7GJTmSg0MHarm0K3Ir5QEb7AOLFqaIxPCNQ60KN NpnJfKewY/ZaAcW+wwQvpV8uS+A/65DFvTOPUFGhj5bubvfvvH9BC+h8a IqfYdyebkuq7FK3rsdcHwxuhkO+jIrJZV0ppxNg+iz+JaQSCjF/36ZFei 2bAB3cmKv6oL0G6MTWRONN+8IjCjkhcy1W7+w2Gfsc7Bs8rNdn34gVNFf iaeHGwWtdBQuHGCZvZ2YtbcqPFb4pspBQQ9VeEp5Bv9BtDACreeo4mx1G A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ewd2hrHWQ26FQa3XGHehZA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: l3wf02T6SIaLLH2uKZw54g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11712"; a="98567912" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,311,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="98567912" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Feb 2026 11:18:04 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0ytlslcMS5W2BBs9es2p5A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: EcEoiAwdTFqCYicmAiS/7A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,311,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="239325732" Received: from vpanait-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.71]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Feb 2026 11:18:02 -0800 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 21:17:59 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Mike Isely at pobox Cc: mike.isely@cobaltdigital.com, Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Sakari Ailus , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] software node: Use-after-free fix in drivers/base/swnode.c Message-ID: References: <20260224191922.2972974-1-mike.isely@cobaltdigital.com> <04eebe7b-0f88-2122-eeef-568117bb8235@isely.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <04eebe7b-0f88-2122-eeef-568117bb8235@isely.net> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 12:59:56PM -0600, Mike Isely wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2026, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 01:19:21PM -0600, mike.isely@cobaltdigital.com wrote: ... > > > This was detected in kernel 6.12, verified also in kernel 6.6. Visual > > > inspection in 6.19.3 source (the latest as of right now) shows the > > > > The latest is v7.0-rc1 as of time of the topic message. > > I actually meant the latest release. Guess I should have checked the > latest release candidate on the off-chance that it might have been > addressed. It is probably not, but the idea to check against latest tag in the vanilla repository. v6.19.3 is not even vanilla, it's stable kernel. > > > same issue. The nearly trivial fix was verified in 6.12. While this > > > patches against 6.19.3, IMHO this is a candidate for all LTS kernels. > > > > Thanks for the contribution, usually for a single patch there is no need > > in cover letter. The comment block can handle this (the place after cutter > > '---' line in the message with a patch). > > Yeah, a separate cover letter is overkill, but I was just following a > process here. What process? I think we have that somewhere in the documentation that cover letter for a single patch is not needed... -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko