From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6280314D05; Mon, 16 Mar 2026 18:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773686871; cv=none; b=ifFVVFxqt9pzDNQ6QRje3YgN/KYYpzpvbT3OdvIEbsRm0CgUB9+tltNArLfPUxfzoHeXKOC/lhn5ya4wGLBvw0nXFciuVgJIIyktcLkHQAQtc50kIir5TnxiXIdMYLS6mMl2lYiLlnwR0AhjWwpD27P6TzcuGt8/UBuBDK+WNro= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773686871; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uZOmVZ2UWUcAzumRLpmvYaj0grP6dv0PdyoAncR2MIc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=edPBuh8YQ97TYGP+dYvmbOVPqJxq0XS9PeTT1jujy1P2huLKkM2+xw1faF8Cq6q/ntverd/woQZH0JYQ4t+Vwb0tDNFD/N7pAe/ZFYbb2iU6G8qY6bCVQztb8gIsZ7h85TTMHf/fkJ2IsxI2JrTrXxvSWRHvJ6itjlPDYqb8KuA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ZfL76DCz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ZfL76DCz" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1773686870; x=1805222870; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=uZOmVZ2UWUcAzumRLpmvYaj0grP6dv0PdyoAncR2MIc=; b=ZfL76DCz26sE7MxHdqWPuUX6HzrCBBbPMXKf1YKa0uF2tAsqKCgLX6XJ TdpB826rztj3nJUbVYH3d/iMou80k+vXdoqiO0qeWOMEnLBRWDkHCvZKU 9iWesdQ+VIGDxqmS2/EYwt2pHvUZJ6w9nsjqdr3b01NKx6wInanEDGoos poxq2MEUrFLisn/VtYQDi8mBMPfY0yli5fW9HOnJmHWS3W1XjpB6RH7A9 qy/IsZ9Fbl8TRSQbgiRcydjm+Kms0LHdMdjnLNLMvZDdRAgUCAL1/eWxG 4LoITA1NFVkkbB3knLbxqzy2+ptG9FtzXgi+CjJB7hFpI8f1juBhbJ4Ns A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: bGaw764dTZGFwdyvUuZ5kg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: IdgeqWQVRX2GAdSGK5kczw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11731"; a="86068181" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,124,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="86068181" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Mar 2026 11:47:49 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: KC7BjTdRQnWi2N4lXiFP0g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: emFOsXm3TxuGMyTSLF80iQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,124,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="226690989" Received: from vpanait-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.237]) by fmviesa005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Mar 2026 11:47:47 -0700 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 20:47:45 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Josh Law Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , kees@kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: processor: idle: Replace strlcat() with better alternative Message-ID: References: <20260316170158.1596857-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <4FC4DDD1-E170-46A9-888A-41D2CD6D97F3@objecting.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FC4DDD1-E170-46A9-888A-41D2CD6D97F3@objecting.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 06:43:58PM +0000, Josh Law wrote: > On 16 March 2026 17:01:58 GMT, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >strlcpy() and strlcat() are confusing APIs and the former one already gone > >from the kernel. In preparation to kill strlcat() replace it with the better > >alternative. > > Is this patch in relation to my string.c patch? Yes. > You would have to do this for about 120~ files. Not me, just showing you what to do. Btw, what kind of assistance do you use for the patches? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko