public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org,
	robert.moore@intel.com, corbet@lwn.net, pierre.gondois@arm.com,
	zhenglifeng1@huawei.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	ray.huang@amd.com, gautham.shenoy@amd.com,
	mario.limonciello@amd.com, perry.yuan@amd.com,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	treding@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com,
	ksitaraman@nvidia.com, sanjayc@nvidia.com, bbasu@nvidia.com,
	sumitg@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] ACPI: CPPC: extend APIs to support auto_sel and epp
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 18:42:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acb19233-1ab1-4c6e-a150-5657daa50846@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aPigDd0QTiRjey7K@arm.com>

Hi Ionela,

Thank you for the comments.


On 22/10/25 14:42, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> Hi Sumit,
>
> On Wednesday 01 Oct 2025 at 20:30:59 (+0530), Sumit Gupta wrote:
>> - Add auto_sel read support in cppc_get_perf_caps().
>> - Add write of both auto_sel and energy_perf in cppc_set_epp_perf().
>> - Remove redundant energy_perf field from 'struct cppc_perf_caps' as
>>    the same is available in 'struct cppc_perf_ctrls' which is used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
>> ---
> [..]
>> @@ -1555,6 +1559,8 @@ int cppc_set_epp_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls, bool enable)
>>        struct cpc_register_resource *auto_sel_reg;
>>        struct cpc_desc *cpc_desc = per_cpu(cpc_desc_ptr, cpu);
>>        struct cppc_pcc_data *pcc_ss_data = NULL;
>> +     bool autosel_support_in_ffh_or_sysmem;
>> +     bool epp_support_in_ffh_or_sysmem;
>>        int ret;
>>
>>        if (!cpc_desc) {
>> @@ -1565,6 +1571,11 @@ int cppc_set_epp_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls, bool enable)
>>        auto_sel_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[AUTO_SEL_ENABLE];
>>        epp_set_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[ENERGY_PERF];
>>
>> +     epp_support_in_ffh_or_sysmem = CPC_SUPPORTED(epp_set_reg) &&
>> +                             (CPC_IN_FFH(epp_set_reg) || CPC_IN_SYSTEM_MEMORY(epp_set_reg));
>> +     autosel_support_in_ffh_or_sysmem = CPC_SUPPORTED(auto_sel_reg) &&
>> +                             (CPC_IN_FFH(auto_sel_reg) || CPC_IN_SYSTEM_MEMORY(auto_sel_reg));
>> +
>>        if (CPC_IN_PCC(epp_set_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(auto_sel_reg)) {
>>                if (pcc_ss_id < 0) {
>>                        pr_debug("Invalid pcc_ss_id for CPU:%d\n", cpu);
>> @@ -1590,8 +1601,19 @@ int cppc_set_epp_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls, bool enable)
>>                ret = send_pcc_cmd(pcc_ss_id, CMD_WRITE);
>>                up_write(&pcc_ss_data->pcc_lock);
>>        } else if (osc_cpc_flexible_adr_space_confirmed &&
>> -                CPC_SUPPORTED(epp_set_reg) && CPC_IN_FFH(epp_set_reg)) {
>> +                epp_support_in_ffh_or_sysmem && autosel_support_in_ffh_or_sysmem) {
> Isn't this problematic for when auto-select is an integer set to 1 or it's
> not present at all? In those cases the EPP register won't be written and
> -ENOTSUPP will be returned.
>
> I suppose for the case when auto-select is not present at all in _CPC
> (it's an optional attribute) it's not very clear what one should do
> regarding writing the EPP register. The specification mentions that
> "Writes to this register only have meaning when Autonomous Selection
> is enabled.". From my perspective the OS should not block writes to the
> EPP register for this case, as autonomous selection might still be
> enabled but not exposed to the OS.
>
> Thanks,
> Ionela.

Will change in v4 to write them independently as below.

-------------
         } else if (osc_cpc_flexible_adr_space_confirmed) {
                 if (!epp_support_in_ffh_or_sysmem && 
!autosel_support_in_ffh_or_sysmem) {
                         ret = -ENOTSUPP;
                 } else {
                         if (autosel_support_in_ffh_or_sysmem) {
                                 ret = cpc_write(cpu, auto_sel_reg, enable);
                                 if (ret)
                                         return ret;
                         }

                         if (epp_support_in_ffh_or_sysmem) {
                                 ret = cpc_write(cpu, epp_set_reg, 
perf_ctrls->energy_perf);
                                 if (ret)
                                         return ret;
                         }
                 }
         } else {
                 ret = -ENOTSUPP;
         }

         if (ret == -ENOTSUPP)
                 pr_debug("_CPC in PCC and _CPC in FFH are not 
supported\n");

-------------

Thank you,
Sumit Gupta


>> +             ret = cpc_write(cpu, auto_sel_reg, enable);
>> +             if (ret) {
>> +                     pr_debug("Failed to write auto_sel=%d for CPU:%d\n", enable, cpu);
>> +                     return ret;
>> +             }
>> +
>>                ret = cpc_write(cpu, epp_set_reg, perf_ctrls->energy_perf);
>> +             if (ret) {
>> +                     pr_debug("Failed to write energy_perf=%u for CPU:%d\n",
>> +                              perf_ctrls->energy_perf, cpu);
>> +                     return ret;
>> +             }
>>        } else {
>>                ret = -ENOTSUPP;
>>                pr_debug("_CPC in PCC and _CPC in FFH are not supported\n");
> [..]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-24 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-01 15:00 [PATCH v3 0/8] Enhanced autonomous selection and improvements Sumit Gupta
2025-10-01 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] cpufreq: CPPC: Add generic helpers for sysfs show/store Sumit Gupta
2025-10-10  3:24   ` Jie Zhan
2025-10-13 12:51     ` Sumit Gupta
2025-10-01 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_get_perf() API to read performance controls Sumit Gupta
2025-10-01 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] ACPI: CPPC: extend APIs to support auto_sel and epp Sumit Gupta
2025-10-22  9:12   ` Ionela Voinescu
2025-10-24 13:12     ` Sumit Gupta [this message]
2025-10-01 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for min/max_perf Sumit Gupta
2025-10-22 10:58   ` Ionela Voinescu
2025-10-24 13:22     ` Sumit Gupta
2025-10-01 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for perf_limited register Sumit Gupta
2025-10-01 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] cpufreq: CPPC: Add sysfs for min/max_perf and perf_limited Sumit Gupta
2025-10-01 17:03   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-10-08 10:16     ` Sumit Gupta
2025-10-10  3:29   ` Jie Zhan
2025-10-13 11:59     ` Sumit Gupta
2025-10-22 12:02   ` Ionela Voinescu
2025-10-24 13:32     ` Sumit Gupta
2025-10-01 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] cpufreq: CPPC: update policy min/max when toggling auto_select Sumit Gupta
2025-10-01 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] cpufreq: CPPC: add autonomous mode boot parameter support Sumit Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acb19233-1ab1-4c6e-a150-5657daa50846@nvidia.com \
    --to=sumitg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ksitaraman@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=sanjayc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox