From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46DF23EDE59; Tue, 12 May 2026 17:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778608748; cv=none; b=o/qdGOShzoGyWX4pglRfSov+13J/dTFV1yaVNQitZbQdn1ElRQ1n/nXzPnwJ4gU+CuxX6w5958EIGVzmHmAfWH4lnbf25nni4QQnkHC5URoXKcz6VL+jh26Haf8ZsW261TOfXERk3ODWiTi3RGm7lYckI6Fd58HNO55loqv7oI4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778608748; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+zlxSB+87SmVSn+j69GTrz3x31i39zFkMe+RiKZscII=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Mn6fxoZuQcyK2NBgT+fQeSgR0L68RsguXP9suHRGeh0zDR5qj+FChaLngDVJGKCpGqNr87BXE2c2/Oo8pGOTTMYI+ilrtoSA32iZsF+em/GiYSe2A9xi933F5nJlQFCZGN1THyBP6KK64C/CwZThchKTfAFfwG6S+k0YjS277OQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=YQilqCka; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="YQilqCka" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1778608747; x=1810144747; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=+zlxSB+87SmVSn+j69GTrz3x31i39zFkMe+RiKZscII=; b=YQilqCkaLFJ+vNs/wNcU7DOzfD6Hg0WgA3JkaLXj2jBXzkNXufnMJ8EN LWtGk6YMsh68C+cw91tPUmi0iEX6rGz3rTvjEUqtM85pV6zgJLVeSyLb6 XAiY1V4Wt3FeG4z9K6ZASFf3MLyjf1wzy3/jz2bvRmxssFPnz4VOMb1S/ m5I3YQwwvxqk4I91EEpnv5BmIKMHtEg6Rj2pP5RNkX4qLSmFOcQSBdaed HD8ayrP8EywZSZo7epKc0JlK6yraF1KVM2Mkv+acex9NUVZib7ZPBiEMF Ylf1mckHlf2+G2hQjoc/BPUGN3knJp3zKknVWhRKlD6y6gSIdRUN57qKc w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: pF5n0DvXSYmsc9A0ARZytw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: AZnJkaD9TqawbTqAcUbTFQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11784"; a="79421887" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,231,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="79421887" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 May 2026 10:59:07 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ipnBLGgHQc2J+5SfFtFwRQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NkOqWvyiT/WihzgMMYmbwQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.244]) by fmviesa003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 May 2026 10:59:03 -0700 Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 20:59:01 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= , Hans de Goede , LKML , Linux ACPI , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Andrea Ho , Eric Piel , Alex Hung , Shravan Sudhakar , AceLan Kao Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] platform/x86: Check ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL Message-ID: References: <6007701.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6007701.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 05:10:35PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi All, > > This series replaces > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/4731840.LvFx2qVVIh@rafael.j.wysocki/ > > and as a whole it makes exactly the same code changes. > > Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match > its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so > platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion > object need to verify its presence. > > Accordingly, add requisite ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() checks > against NULL to 5 platform/x86 drivers where they are missing. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko to the whole series. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko