From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFF0E33A70E; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784227014; cv=none; b=puLSNBr31zCsTlqeRaAPnDxA8tlSK9yeQddvdnv9NxcbsD6YS4z8uOFgoT2VbItB52jzt+XNLti2GK6Mvf2PSasEjGTXmD/VDfeDF9S9tm62Vwe1AgXSDlnSdZzuGweNmOiSaI+6Zypl0KCiHt7h20tRLtrGXighxaoK0HZxspo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784227014; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BchtDMMKp+TIsPTrVl+PvcLDOZOFvhR42RmqjR0SZf0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jpN24dA/F4s2Yex1u7s+zQXlzeXvz8146UF2phKDgJd/9sDnIR4BNORnvhHAF5Zfq+BW2nh3sZP7rdXUElkwjLx8i082E7sfckLH1HaN7TijJIJVjqymKHQEj4LM2uGooFCz0tapegLbz95l0WVX/8PmF7jAEiTwRfavdN02R6o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=O09A3qDh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="O09A3qDh" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1784227012; x=1815763012; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=BchtDMMKp+TIsPTrVl+PvcLDOZOFvhR42RmqjR0SZf0=; b=O09A3qDhf4fDI8eJZiLUymqiOtuu+m7dVI+eIpyXCsUFn6OW++NHj00w lfUZQ8LqyT8DiOfZp/QAD9lc8QLT/Ay+mxIxX6Lb06HAzksBn2ZNr7yJV gMltuur3yrSfqn2PrOWYkmztAIWdoxdP1UtqCbRR3pFNrQj/oUjKZjjW0 FghGiTddeQu0RGtXxBwjd9N3o92ZdT+B6E1usEMNcgmcTmLfi6iF6ao7M DCc0Vr9VIy5SSbK2jAqGKC7BYOC9dTBGBCjKglxojLz/zM7bNnBZMMAoc 1i7npfTLJS3g8YG66oVnCBpgEFIYn7PAuQO8BKTRfg/bJoqiBBP+aDzBX Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: PhC2l1wpT7GguzNQ1vh23w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: PJBW33RUSUWJmU/2nXt4TQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11848"; a="84674869" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,167,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="84674869" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2026 11:36:51 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: NLhMM2KLRSa+IAHR8Qe9RQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: e7zl5Y0IT/acSWvpLiU8Tg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,167,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="281018681" Received: from conormcd-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.26]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2026 11:36:49 -0700 Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 21:36:47 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux ACPI , Linux PCI , LKML , Bjorn Helgaas , Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ACPI: PCI: Introduce acpi_dev_get_pci_dev() Message-ID: References: <12935400.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki> <3430928.44csPzL39Z@rafael.j.wysocki> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3430928.44csPzL39Z@rafael.j.wysocki> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 04:04:53PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Some acpi_get_pci_dev() callers already have a struct ACPI device for > which they want to get the struct pci_dev pointer of the associated > PCI device, so they don't need to look for one. > > For this reason, add acpi_dev_get_pci_dev() that will get a PCI device > for a given ACPI one (if possible) and turn acpi_get_pci_dev() into > a static inline helper passing the acpi_fetch_acpi_dev() return value > directly to acpi_dev_get_pci_dev(). > > No intentional functional impact. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko