From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [RFC v1 03/11] genirq: Use CONFIG_NUMA instead of CONFIG_SMP to guard irq_common_data.node Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 22:44:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <1430709339-29083-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> <1430709339-29083-4-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1430709339-29083-4-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jiang Liu Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Randy Dunlap , Yinghai Lu , Borislav Petkov , Jason Cooper , Grant Likely , Kevin Cernekee , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Tony Luck , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 4 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote: > NUMA is enabled by CONFIG_NUMA instead of CONFIG_SMP, so use CONFIG_NUMA > to guard irq_common_data.node. Please move this change to the front and do it on irq_data. That would have avoided confusing Abel :) Thanks, tglx