From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Cc: Linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: add preemption point after each opcode parse
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:13:08 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809291512450.2962@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080925174030.17128.78242.stgit@thinkpad>
applied to acpi-test.
thanks,
-len
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=122236382701062&w=2
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
> Tested-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/acpi/parser/psloop.c | 2 ++
> include/acpi/acmacros.h | 5 +++++
> include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/parser/psloop.c b/drivers/acpi/parser/psloop.c
> index c06238e..4647039 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/parser/psloop.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/parser/psloop.c
> @@ -719,6 +719,8 @@ acpi_ps_complete_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
> *op = NULL;
> }
>
> + ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT();
> +
> return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_OK);
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acmacros.h b/include/acpi/acmacros.h
> index 57ab9e9..b402685 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acmacros.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acmacros.h
> @@ -703,4 +703,9 @@ struct acpi_integer_overlay {
>
> #endif /* ACPI_DBG_TRACK_ALLOCATIONS */
>
> +/* Preemption point */
> +#ifndef ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT
> +#define ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() /* no preemption */
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* ACMACROS_H */
> diff --git a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> index 9af4645..029c8c0 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/ctype.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <asm/system.h>
> #include <asm/atomic.h>
> #include <asm/div64.h>
> @@ -137,4 +138,9 @@ static inline void *acpi_os_acquire_object(acpi_cache_t * cache)
> #define ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED(a) acpi_os_allocate_zeroed(a)
> #define ACPI_FREE(a) kfree(a)
>
> +/*
> + * We need to show where it is safe to preempt execution of ACPICA
> + */
> +#define ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() cond_resched()
> +
> #endif /* __ACLINUX_H__ */
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-29 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-25 17:40 [PATCH] ACPICA: add preemption point after each opcode parse Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-29 19:13 ` Len Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0809291512450.2962@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=Linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox