From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] PNP: don't check disabled PCI BARs for conflicts in quirk_system_pci_resources() Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:13:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <200809290953.56565.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <200809290957.59813.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <48E11EFA.8010402@keyaccess.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <48E11EFA.8010402@keyaccess.nl> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rene Herman Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Jesse Barnes , Len Brown , Frans Pop , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Adam Belay , Avuton Olrich , Karl Bellve , Willem Riede , Matthew Hall List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Rene Herman wrote: > > I believe the possible issue is that resources that do _not_ (seem to) start > at zero might also be disabled. But that is irrelevant. If we have registered them in the resource tree, then PnP must ignore them. The fact is, this is not about being enabled or disabled. This is about the PnP tree containing resources that we already parsed from the PCI stuff, and once we've seen them as PCI resources, there's not really anything valuable in the PnP information. Linus