public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Adam Belay <abelay@mit.edu>,
	Avuton Olrich <avuton@gmail.com>,
	Karl Bellve <karl.bellve@umassmed.edu>,
	Willem Riede <wriede@riede.org>,
	Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] PNP: don't check disabled PCI BARs for conflicts in quirk_system_pci_resources()
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:13:25 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0809301107500.3262@nehalem.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0809301052200.3436@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>



On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> Hmm?  Bjorn? Everything that is true about "pnp_system_init" should be 
> equally true abote pnpacpi_init and pnpbios_init, no?

Side note: unlike the more radical "move all arch driver initcalls 
earlier", this one actually works for me. But it does cause 
pnp_system_init() to actually run before pnpacpi_init and pnpbios_init, 
due to the link order within PnP. That seems ok, since the system/acpi/pnp 
drivers should all be just different versions of PnP drivers, but I 
thought I'd mention it. Maybe there is some PnP internal reason why 
pnp_system_init should run after the pnp_acpi/bios_init functions.

(And if so, then just changing the order in drivers/pnp/Makefile would fix 
it up again).

Bjorn, is there any reason why this isn't the right thign to do?

Rene - I have this suspicion that just doing this part should already fix 
your issues with _no_ other patch, since now anything PnP does is after 
all the PCI setup code anyway. So does your sound card (or whatever it 
was) work by just doing the subsys_initcall -> fs_initcall change in PnP?

		Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-30 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-29 15:53 [patch 0/2] don't check disabled PCI BARs for conflicts with PNP devices Bjorn Helgaas
2008-09-29 15:56 ` [patch 1/2] PCI: add pci_resource_enabled() Bjorn Helgaas
2008-09-29 15:57 ` [patch 2/2] PNP: don't check disabled PCI BARs for conflicts in quirk_system_pci_resources() Bjorn Helgaas
2008-09-29 16:34   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-29 18:31     ` Rene Herman
2008-09-29 19:13       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-30  9:19         ` Rene Herman
2008-09-30 14:48           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-30 15:57             ` Rene Herman
2008-09-30 16:29               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-30 17:10                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-30 17:21                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-30 19:29                     ` Rene Herman
2008-09-30 19:37                       ` Rene Herman
2008-09-30 19:44                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-30 20:48                         ` Rene Herman
2008-09-30 19:38                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-30 19:51                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-30 19:54                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-30 20:01                         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-01  6:13                         ` Grant Grundler
2008-10-01  8:26                           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-06  5:34                             ` Grant Grundler
2008-10-01 15:14                           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-01 16:21                             ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-30 20:05                       ` Rolf Eike Beer
2008-10-01  8:52                         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-30 18:01                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-30 18:13                   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-09-30 19:51                     ` Rene Herman
2008-09-30 19:16                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-09-30 19:12                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-10-01 20:18                   ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0809301107500.3262@nehalem.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=abelay@mit.edu \
    --cc=avuton@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=elendil@planet.nl \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=karl.bellve@umassmed.edu \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhall@mhcomputing.net \
    --cc=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=wriede@riede.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox