Re: [PATCH]1/3 intel_menlow:Adding comment for GTHS legal values

[Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>]

Hi Sujith,

I applied 1/3 and 2/3.
I had to hand-edit them because they were line wrapped
by your mailer.

This is only a minor waste of my time for a trivial patch,
but for a longer patch, I'm not going to do that for you.

Please read Documentation/SubmittingPatches

note that it is [PATCH 1/3], not [PATCH] 1/3 -- as future
generations don't need the '1/3' in the commit message...

thanks,
-Len

ps. also, don't bother sending a copy of patches to my intel.com
address, that goes to exchange, which destroys patches.
I apply all patches from my kernel.org account, which is
subscribed to the lists.

On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Thomas, Sujith wrote:

> Documentation of legal values for GTHS
> To be patched over Rui's 09/11 bug fix patch
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sujith Thomas <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/intel_menlow.c |    5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.27/drivers/misc/intel_menlow.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.27.orig/drivers/misc/intel_menlow.c
> +++ linux-2.6.27/drivers/misc/intel_menlow.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,11 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  #define MEMORY_ARG_CUR_BANDWIDTH 1
>  #define MEMORY_ARG_MAX_BANDWIDTH 0
>  
> +/*
> + * GTHS returning 'n' would mean that [0,n-1] states are supported
> + * In that case max_cstate would be n-1
> + * GTHS returning '0' would mean that no bandwidth control states are
> supported
> + */
>  static int memory_get_int_max_bandwidth(struct thermal_cooling_device
> *cdev,
>  					unsigned long *max_state)
>  {
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>