From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ACPI patches for 2.6.28-rc3
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:48:33 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0811072147450.9051@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1226032765-15330-1-git-send-email-lenb@kernel.org>
 <20081107174126.9C9F02288E4@ss27-so02.mtu.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vms173007pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.7]:43262 "EHLO
	vms173007pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751311AbYKHCsg (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:48:36 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([96.237.168.40])
 by vms173007.mailsrvcs.net
 (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr  3 2006))
 with ESMTPA id <0K9Z00IDFUFEXIK3@vms173007.mailsrvcs.net> for
 linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:47:39 -0600 (CST)
In-reply-to: <20081107174126.9C9F02288E4@ss27-so02.mtu.ru>
Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
To: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>



> You still did not include video brightness patches from Thomas; nor are they
> in acpi-test. Are they delayed for -29 or rejected? If they are rejected it
> would be nice to know why so we could fix them ...

hmmm, yeah, several folks have pointed this out,
not sure what happened there, but will follow up.

thanks,
-Len