From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [git pull] ACPI patches for 2.6.29-rc3 Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:20:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <1234032829.3752.11.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.5]:15608 "EHLO vms173005pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750787AbZBHFUp (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2009 00:20:45 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([96.237.168.40]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KEQ008IOEU8DI83@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 23:20:33 -0600 (CST) In-reply-to: <1234032829.3752.11.camel@localhost> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Vroon Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Tony Vroon wrote: > It appears my patch from Feb 2, 2009 with subject: > [PATCH 2.6.29] fujitsu-laptop: Use RFKILL support bitmask from firmware > > failed to make it into this batch. Could I have some feedback on why > please? It was appropriately ack'd by the maintainer, tested on relevant > platforms and fixes a bug on at least 1 known machine. I simply missed it -- as I sometimes do with e-mail. Thanks for the ping, your patch is in acpi-test now. -Len