From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] sony-laptop for 2.6.30 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:10:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <1235882445-2404-1-git-send-email-malattia@linux.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from vms173007pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.7]:53767 "EHLO vms173007pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750956AbZCPFLN (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:11:13 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([96.237.168.40]) by vms173007.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KGL00C4N2DXVB71@vms173007.mailsrvcs.net> for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:10:46 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: <1235882445-2404-1-git-send-email-malattia@linux.it> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Mattia Dongili Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org I snapped these up when i was traveling -- I think I didn't get a chance to reply. a couple of nits for next time... Subject: [PATCH a/b] [sony-laptop] bla bla bla should be: Subject: [PATCH a/b] sony-laptop: bla bla bla because everything between []'s get deleted by git-am Also, some of the From: and Signed-off-by's were not quite right. If you're not the original author, then the From: for the author should be the first line in the body. It doesn't again go down by the Signed-off-by:. Also, the orignal author should have the 1st signed-off-by line, as they're generally intended to show the path that the patch took to the kernel... thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center