From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20090321200534.GA30238@elte.hu> <20090323005738.GB6003@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090323005738.GB6003@localhost> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wu Fengguang Cc: Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Natalie Protasevich , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Nick Piggin , Peter Zijlstra List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > > > I think this was tracked back to the effective halving of > > dirty_ratio by 1cf6e7d83 ("mm: task dirty accounting fix") and > > doubling the ratio fixed the iozone regression. > > Yes, exactly. The patch for fixing this regression is trivial. I was planning on applying that patch only after 2.6.29 is out, and then if there are no surprising side effects and nobody complains, we'd then back-port it into stable. Linus