From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Karol Kozimor <sziwan@users.sourceforge.net>,
Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>,
acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ACPI: allow drivers to request both device and system notify events
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:41:15 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0905271840110.25587@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090430153537.12628.5751.stgit@bob.kio>
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> System notify events (0x00-0x7f) are common across all device types
> and should be handled in Linux/ACPI, not in drivers. However, some
> BIOSes use system notify events in device-specific ways that require
> the driver to be involved.
>
> This patch adds a ACPI_DRIVER_ALL_NOTIFY_EVENTS driver flag. When a
> driver sets this flag and supplies a .notify method, Linux/ACPI calls
> the .notify method for ALL notify events on the device, not just the
> device-specific (0x80-0xff) events.
What bad things would happen if we did this by default
rather than requiring a driver to ask for it?
thanks,
-Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 6 +++++-
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> index e8f7b64..fd6a930 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> @@ -549,6 +549,7 @@ static void acpi_bus_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 type, void *data)
> {
> int result = 0;
> struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
> + struct acpi_driver *driver;
>
> blocking_notifier_call_chain(&acpi_bus_notify_list,
> type, (void *)handle);
> @@ -629,7 +630,10 @@ static void acpi_bus_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 type, void *data)
> break;
> }
>
> - return;
> + driver = device->driver;
> + if (driver && driver->ops.notify &&
> + (driver->flags & ACPI_DRIVER_ALL_NOTIFY_EVENTS))
> + driver->ops.notify(device, type);
> }
>
> /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> index c34b110..84e35d5 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -114,10 +114,13 @@ struct acpi_device_ops {
> acpi_op_notify notify;
> };
>
> +#define ACPI_DRIVER_ALL_NOTIFY_EVENTS 0x1 /* system AND device events */
> +
> struct acpi_driver {
> char name[80];
> char class[80];
> const struct acpi_device_id *ids; /* Supported Hardware IDs */
> + unsigned int flags;
> struct acpi_device_ops ops;
> struct device_driver drv;
> struct module *owner;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-27 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-30 15:35 [PATCH 0/6] ACPI: support system events for .notify Bjorn Helgaas
2009-04-30 15:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] ACPI: allow drivers to request both device and system notify events Bjorn Helgaas
2009-05-27 22:41 ` Len Brown [this message]
2009-05-28 0:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-04-30 15:35 ` [PATCH 3/6] ACPI: battery: use .notify method instead of installing handler directly Bjorn Helgaas
[not found] ` <20090430153419.12628.91088.stgit-tBlMHHroXgg@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-30 15:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] ACPI: ac: " Bjorn Helgaas
2009-04-30 15:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] ACPI: asus-laptop: " Bjorn Helgaas
2009-04-30 15:35 ` [PATCH 5/6] ACPI: asus-acpi: " Bjorn Helgaas
2009-04-30 15:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] ACPI: eeepc-laptop: " Bjorn Helgaas
2009-05-27 22:47 ` Len Brown
2009-05-27 22:51 ` [PATCH 0/6] ACPI: support system events for .notify Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0905271840110.25587@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=corentincj@iksaif.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=sziwan@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox