From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ACPI: use handle, not device, in system notification path
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:32:46 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0905272132430.25587@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090522174223.4304.7099.stgit@bob.kio>
applied to acpi-test
thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Currently, ACPI hotplug is mostly handled in drivers. I'm working on moving
> that hotplug support out of drivers and into the Linux/ACPI core.
>
> These patches change the Linux/ACPI notify handling to use the
> acpi_handle a bit longer before looking up an acpi_device.
>
> System notifications often deal with device presence and status change.
> In these cases, we may not have an acpi_device. For example, we may
> get a Device Check notification on an object that previously was not
> present. Since the object was not present, we would not have had an
> acpi_device for it.
>
> Note: The last patch in this series depends on this previous patch
> that is not upstream yet:
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/21076/
>
> Comments welcome.
>
> ---
>
> Bjorn Helgaas (4):
> ACPI: use handle, not device, in system notification path
> ACPI: remove unused return values from Bus Check & Device Check handling
> ACPI: remove unused "status_changed" return value from Check Device handling
> ACPI: simplify notification debug messages
>
>
> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 93 +++++++++++++---------------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
> --
> Bjorn
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-28 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-22 17:43 [PATCH 0/4] ACPI: use handle, not device, in system notification path Bjorn Helgaas
2009-05-22 17:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: simplify notification debug messages Bjorn Helgaas
2009-05-22 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: remove unused "status_changed" return value from Check Device handling Bjorn Helgaas
2009-05-22 17:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI: remove unused return values from Bus Check & Device Check handling Bjorn Helgaas
2009-05-22 17:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: use handle, not device, in system notification path Bjorn Helgaas
2009-05-28 1:32 ` Len Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0905272132430.25587@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox