From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: 00/65 ACPI & driver patch queue 2.6.31 Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:12:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.5]:50526 "EHLO vms173005pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752129AbZE3CMo (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2009 22:12:44 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([98.118.45.40]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KKF00BPJQ4ZYC64@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 21:12:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (d975xbx2 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n4U2CYhi032302 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 22:12:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (lenb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id n4U2CYVs032298 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 22:12:34 -0400 Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Those with sharp eyes will notice that series of 65 patches included again the 11 that were just sent to 2.6.30. (By mistake, I generated the series with linus..test, rather release..test) So there should have been only 55 patches (and when I noticed that ^C killed the intro message, but went ahead and sent the 65 patches:-( Anyway, that series includes everything in the acpi test tree (and thus in linux-next). Except for the reset patch, they're all expected to go into 2.6.31, some with some updates. I've got some more patches to sift through on patchwork: http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/list/ If you have something that you'd like in 2.6.31 that isn't represented above, this would be a good time to let that be known. thanks, -Len