From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: Regression in ACPI in 2.6.31-rc5 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:53:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <200908072333.24631.storm@sys49152.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.1]:28233 "EHLO vms173001pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752836AbZHMDxT (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:53:19 -0400 In-reply-to: <200908072333.24631.storm@sys49152.net> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > I had two drivers stop working in 2.6.31 that were working fine in 2.6.30. > They are iwlagn and sky2. If i pass acpi=off to the kernel, they work as > expected. the bug report for this issue is here: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 is it possible to bisect which commit between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31-rc5 caused this regression? Please attach the dmesg from the working 2.6.30 and the acpi=off 2.6.31 to the bug report so i can compare them to the failing 2.6.31 thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center