Re: [patch 05/12] fujitsu-laptop: fix tests of acpi_evaluate_integer() return

[Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:

> From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> 
> The wrong test was used acpi_status status is unsigned.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@physics.adelaide.edu.au>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c~fujitsu-laptop-fix-tests-of-acpi_evaluate_integer-return drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c~fujitsu-laptop-fix-tests-of-acpi_evaluate_integer-return
> +++ a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static int get_lcd_level(void)
>  
>  	status =
>  	    acpi_evaluate_integer(fujitsu->acpi_handle, "GBLL", NULL, &state);
> -	if (status < 0)
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>  		return status;

as status is a positive number, shouldn't we be returning something like 
-1 here on failure, rather than status?

>  
>  	fujitsu->brightness_level = state & 0x0fffffff;
> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static int get_max_brightness(void)
>  
>  	status =
>  	    acpi_evaluate_integer(fujitsu->acpi_handle, "RBLL", NULL, &state);
> -	if (status < 0)
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>  		return status;
>  
>  	fujitsu->max_brightness = state;
> _
>