Re: [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33

Alan Stern
2009-12-08T03:27:53Z

On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> However, the parent can be on a different bus type than the children, so it
> looks like we can only start the asynchronous path at the core level.

Agreed.

> > Unless you want to do _all_ of the async logic in generic code and
> > re-introduce the "dev->async_suspend" flag.
>
> Quite frankly, I would like to.
>
> > I would be ok with that now that the infrastructure seems so simple.
>
> Well, perhaps I should dig out my original async suspend/resume patches
> that didn't contain all of the non-essential stuff and post them here for
> discussion, after all ...

That seems like a very good idea. IIRC they were quite similar to what
we have been discussing.

Alan Stern